Romney Mocked For Using Fake Twitter Account To Defend...Romney

Ricter said:
I'm thinking a conference call, just using Skype, could sort this out. H4M, me, and you. During the call you send a PM via ET to each of us, giving a random word. During the call, each of us tells you the word. Two different people giving you two different words. Would that work?

I'm suggesting this to you because I think the rest of the rightie club here would respect your conclusion.
More...

I could easily get someone to play another "not me" on skype. There's just no way you can prove it short of me knowing who you are in person and knowing who the other you is in person.

And lets face it, my old friend. Its not like you haven't been caught playing another sock puppet in the past.

Freddie is guilty of at least three other nicks. Slart is back under a new nick, claiming it isn't him. You've done it before with your Dave101011 stunt. Tony Stark was previously AK Forty Seven and pretends that he wasn't (we all know he was, even the mods). So I'm in the "fool me once, shame on you" not gonna fool me twice routine.
 
Claiming it isn't him?

Tackleberry Clavin and his fragrant imagination again.

And... what about your other nic Mr CFO? You have Bugenhagen super blocked.
 
Last edited:
Tsing Tao said:
I could easily get someone to play another "not me" on skype. There's just no way you can prove it short of me knowing who you are in person and knowing who the other you is in person.

And lets face it, my old friend. Its not like you haven't been caught playing another sock puppet in the past.

Freddie is guilty of at least three other nicks. Slart is back under a new nick, claiming it isn't him. You've done it before with your Dave101011 stunt. Tony Stark was previously AK Forty Seven and pretends that he wasn't (we all know he was, even the mods). So I'm in the "fool me once, shame on you" not gonna fool me twice routine.
More...
Well, I tried to figure out a way. But until you have proof the other way maybe lay off the claim?
 
Ricter said:
Well, I tried to figure out a way. But until you have proof the other way maybe lay off the claim?
More...

I didn't bring it up. Your alter-ego did. Don't bring it up and I won't. Mention it and expect a response.
 
maximumpossiblesuffering said:
If our retaliating, multi billionaire Commander-In-Chief takes a fall, I suspect nobody would miss it, even from a bomb shelter with all media off!
More...

The thing is, one often wonders about how much many on the dogmatic right, on average because every dog has his day, are just being a dick or are genuinely blind to the negative space so full of nuance and detail to normal people.

Trump can fool you into thinking he was a multi-billionaire. The old "If you're so smart, why ain't you rich?" and follows if you are "rich"..

I have told you before, being objectively perceptive (not Dunning Kruger mount stupid is my happy place as there are no consequences perceptive) is the talent to develop.

You can deduce who anyone is by topics they are interested, style of expression and how they interact with people. That series of videos I showed you on 9_11 truther debunking would make a HUGE difference to your trading if you take it in (the approach).

Anyway, I've got to give out to a buddy for not seeing the range on the ES was going to double ;) He fell for the bull trap.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top