Romney Looks Like the Next Pres

[Lucrum]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Yes Obama has troops in Afghanistan....

You should have stopped right there, every thing that followed is irrelevant.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Lucrum:

You should have stopped right there, every thing that followed is irrelevant.

Obama said during the campaign that he would end the Iraq war and send more troops to Afghanistan to take out Al quada


McCain said he would keep troops in Afghanistan,keep troops in Iraq and promised more wars were coming



I voted for the guy who promised the least amount of war



2012

Obama has ended The Iraq war ,set a time to leave Afghanistan, has cut defense spending and is taking a much lesser aggressive stance towards Iran


Romney wont say when he will leave Afghanistan,says that we should still be in Iraq ,wants to increase the 700 billion dollar a year defense budget and has promised a very aggressive foreign policy stance towards Iran and other countries


Again,I am voting for the guy promising less war and cutting military industrial complex spending.

 

[jem]

Quote from Spiker:

Sadly there is the one X Factor that is missing. . . . . ROMNEY IS NOT PRESIDENTIAL MATERIAL.. Not only will we once again be the laughing stock of the outside world, the terrorists will be rubbing their hands with glee in anticipation..

Harvard Jd/MBA
Gov of a very Liberal state
Highly successful business man
Super competent running the Olympics

He has more Presidential material than the current President who still has not really run anything competently.

 

[jem]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Obama said during the campaign that he would end the Iraq war and send more troops to Afghanistan to take out Al quada


McCain said he would keep troops in Afghanistan,keep troops in Iraq and promised more wars were coming



I voted for the guy who promised the least amount of war



2012

Obama has ended The Iraq war ,set a time to leave Afghanistan, has cut defense spending and is taking a much lesser aggressive stance towards Iran


Romney wont say when he will leave Afghanistan,says that we should still be in Iraq ,wants to increase the 700 billion dollar a year defense budget and has promised a very aggressive foreign policy stance towards Iran and other countries


Again,I am voting for the guy promising less war and cutting military industrial complex spending.

wait let me guess after shilling for Obama for 4 years... you just made up your mind to vote for him. You need a new routine.
No one here thinks you are an open minded voter. You have had an agenda for years.

 

[jem]

Quote from IShopAtPublix:

That is not a deep analysis of US presidential elections. If you can't energize your base, you are fucked. It is that simple. Nobody is going to be excited to vote for Romney save for his family. He has been the weakest frontrunner by far in recent memory. He almost lost the state he was born in and where his father was governor to a laughable joke of a candidate. Only reason Romney carried Ohio, Michigan, etc is because of 5:1 or more spending advantage. Regardless of how Obama's fundraising goes Romney won't have 5:1 or 10:1 spending advantage.

Fact of the matter is, Romney is a 3rd rate politician. He does not connect with voters, looks stiff, bland, boring, has zero charisma. Americans don't vote for robots or corpses for president.

Romney has been a classical private equity businessman. I don't know about you, but I don't want a country run like a leveraged buyout.

As to evangelical voters, Obama is the status quo. Evangelicals look at Mormonism as a cult. Between Obama vs unknown, Obama is better. Mitt Romney is an active supporter of Mormon church. He gave it millions of dollars, and vast numbers of evangelicals do NOT want to see it expand.

1. I was not trying to be deep I was writing for an audience that might be the least receptive to the liberal lies we see here everyday.
(pretty shallow)

2. Romney is warming up... he was pretty bland. But the base is going to be excited about avoiding four more years of decimation.

3. Obama may be the status quo, but evangelicals have now seen what Obama and Obamacare will do. Right now on the constitutional right of religious freedom, the Obama administration is seen as only one step up from Pilate.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from jem:

wait let me guess after shilling for Obama for 4 years... you just made up your mind to vote for him. You need a new routine.
No one here thinks you are an open minded voter. You have had an agenda for years.

You must have missed all those posts I made stating I would vote for Paul over Obama in a general election

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Obama said during the campaign that he would end the Iraq war and send more troops to Afghanistan to take out Al quada

Making him just as big a warmonger as the rest. We had already done most of the damage to the Taliban before Bush left office. We're just spinning our wheels over now and have been the entire time Obama has been the CIC.

Again,I am voting for the guy promising less war...

War IS war, you can't be a little bit pregnant.
Go ahead and rationalize and delude yourself all you want though. Obviously you're good at that or you'd never supported BO to begin with.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Lucrum:

Making him just as big a warmonger as the rest. We had already done most of the damage to the Taliban before Bush left office. We're just spinning our wheels over now and have been the entire time Obama has been the CIC.


War IS war, you can't be a little bit pregnant.
Go ahead and rationalize and delude yourself all you want though. Obviously you're good at that or you'd never supported BO to begin with.

While its true most of the damage to the Taliban had been done before Bush left office,Bin Laden and 22 of the top 30 Al Qaeda leaders were killed in Afghanistan/Pakistan under Obama


Yes war is war and you can't be a little bit pregnant,but you can have one baby at the end of 3 years or you can have 3 babies at the end of 3 years.McCain would have had 3 babies(Iraq,Afghanistan/Iran)


You Go ahead and rationalize and delude yourself all you want .You claim to be against the wars and to much spending but vote for the party that started the wars,wants to continue the wars,increased defense spending from 300 billion under Clinton to 700 billion under Bush ,turned Clinton's balanced budget to a 1.2 trillion dollar deficit etc

Romeny is now promising you he will keep the Bush tax cuts,cut individual taxes even more,cut the corporate tax,increase defense spending and cut the deficit and hes going to pay for all that by cutting social programs...and you believe it

 

[jem]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

You must have missed all those posts I made stating I would vote for Paul over Obama in a general election

AK - I am giving you a hard time true. But come on we know you have a brain... now you are patronizing us but it is so far fetched it something else.

Its like saying I would vote for Obama if he would eliminate personal income tax, replace it with a flat tax on corps, ban any form of giving money to politicians for anything and make sure neither congress or the Fed debased the dollar.

Oh wait... that would be like voting for Paul.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from jem:

AK - I am giving you a hard time true. But come on we know you have a brain... now you are patronizing us but it is so far fetched it something else.

Its like saying I would vote for Obama if he would eliminate personal income tax, replace it with a flat tax on corps, ban any form of giving money to politicians for anything and make sure neither congress or the Fed debased the dollar.

Oh wait... that would be like voting for Paul.

Just take a look at all my anti war/ anti military industrial complex spending posts to see why I would vote for Paul.I don't agree with all of Pauls or Obama's policies but defense spending and ending and not starting anymore wars is one of my top issues