Romney Looks Like the Next Pres

Quote from jem:

I changed my quote to include a comment on Palin.

Trends change... you shall see. When you see that Obama has lost all those independents who do you think they were?



1.A trend that began in 1992 isn't going to all of a sudden change for Romney.Those with advanced dont vote for the guy with the highest education,they vote on issues.Since they are likely well off financially they usually vote for dems due to social issues. Obama is also a Harvard law grad like Romney





2.Obama hasn't lost independents



http://www.gallup.com/poll/153764/Obama-Solidifying-Lead-Among-Independents-Swing-States.aspx



April 4, 2012


Obama Solidifying Lead Among Independents in Swing States
Independent women widely favor Obama after previously backing Romney



by Jeffrey M. Jones

PRINCETON, NJ -- Barack Obama has a 48% to 39% advantage over Mitt Romney among independent voters in 12 key swing states.
 
Quote from jem:



Now we see a smart guy with a JD MBA who is beyond competent.

Sounds all good Jem, now if you could just remind Romney not to tie his dog on the roof rack and drive in public. :( .
 
Ak You keep bringing up polls with skewed over sampling...
lets stick to real polls like rasmuessens.


Quote from jem:

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 24% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-one percent (41%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -17 (see trends).

In a hypothetical Election 2012 matchup, Mitt Romney earns 48% of the vote, while President Obama attracts 44%. That's Romney's biggest advantage in over a month. Matchup results are updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update). See tracking history.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...ministration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

Thanks for the cite to Rasmuessen - Thesis in tact.
 
Quote from jem:

Ak You keep bringing up polls with skewed over sampling...
lets stick to real polls like rasmuessens.


The polls arent skewed over sampling jem

There are 42 million registered democrats in The US,30 million registered republicans

If a poll randomly calls 1000 registered voters odds are there will be more registered democrats in the poll then registered republicans because there are more registered democrats in the country.If a poll selectively takes out democrats that were randomly called and replace them with republicans then the poll would be rigged.That might be what Rasmussen is doing since usually there are around 5 credible polls showing Obama ahead and rasmussen showing the opposite





http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2011-12-22/voters-political-parties/52171688/1



Registered Democrats still dominate the political playing field with more than 42 million voters, compared to 30 million Republicans and 24 million independents
 
Quote from jem:

Ak You keep bringing up polls with skewed over sampling...
lets stick to real polls like rasmuessens.

One of the best polls out there


http://www.intrade.com/v4/home/


2czd37r.jpg
 
Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Presidential historical fact


100 % of US Presidents running for re election during a time of war have been re elected

Well that explains why Americans are still dying unnecessarily in Afghanistan.
BO's goal isn't to win in Afghanistan, it's to get re-elected on the backs of dead American soldiers.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Well that explains why Americans are still dying unnecessarily in Afghanistan.
BO's goal isn't to win in Afghanistan, it's to get re-elected on the backs of dead American soldiers.

That is some of the biggest crock of shit you have ever posted

Dont act like you care about dead soldiers when you supported the guy who started Iraq and Afghanistan(Bush),the guy who wanted to stay in Iraq 100 years,wanted to stay in Afghanistan,start a new war with Iran and is always the first guy to call for military action in any foreign policy issue(Mccain)

You are currently supporting the chickenhawk who says we were wrong to exit Iraq ,wants to stay in Afghanistan,and wants to start a war with Iran (Even though he nor any of his 5 sons would ever dream of joining the military to fight a war that he wants our troops to keep fighting)





http://articles.boston.com/2011-06-14/news/29657598_1_afghanistan-mitt-romney-pullout



Mitt Romney, Ron Paul clash on Afghanistan pullout



Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Texas Congressman Ron Paul are disagreeing on how quickly to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan.

Romney said at a Republican presidential debate Monday that generals in Afghanistan should guide the pullout schedule based to conditions on the ground. He said the troops should come home as soon as possible under those conditions.

Paul said the president must tell generals what to do. He said if he were president he would begin withdrawing troops almost immediately. He said the United States has no purpose fighting a war in Afghanistan.





http://news.yahoo.com/iraq-pullout-signature-failure-obama-romney-203147930.html


Iraq pullout a "signature failure" for Obama: Romney



LITTLETON, New Hampshire (Reuters) - Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney on Thursday attacked U.S. President Barack Obama for a "signature failure" to keep some troops in Iraq to prevent the country falling back into sectarian conflict.

Just days after U.S. troops left Iraq, a wave of bombings killed at least 72 people in Baghdad on Thursday. The Shi'ite-led government is engulfed in a crisis that risks fracturing Iraq along sectarian and ethnic fault lines.

A consistent front-runner in polls of Republicans, Romney said he feared leaving Iraq without a stabilization force could put the hard-earned successes and victories there at risk.

"I hope that risk is not realized. I hope that we're able to see stability there but the president's failure to secure an agreement and maintain 10,000 to 30,000 troops in Iraq has to be one of his signature failures," he told Reuters.
 
Quote from AK Forty Seven:



"I hope that risk is not realized. I hope that we're able to see stability there but the president's failure to secure an agreement and maintain 10,000 to 30,000 troops in Iraq has to be one of his signature failures," he(Romney) told Reuters.


I might support Romney if his 5 sons were part of those 10,000 to 30,000 troops he wants fighting in Iraq
 
Quote from AK Forty Seven:

I might support Romney if his 5 sons were part of those 10,000 to 30,000 troops he wants fighting in Iraq

Lie-brals and their selective memories, what can you do but laugh? :p

attachment.php
 

Attachments

Back
Top