Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:
I'm not the one hung up on fed or state run programs . I said govt theft which includes both. however a state funded and run program is better.
Federal govt stealing and apportioning to ind states to administer has the same moral hazard so I see little difference in your supposed distinction.
I suspect you made it just to be "pissy" in your words.
Oh since that's what we have now .
All you want is a do over.
remember"you're hanging your hat (validity ) on "we're gonna get it RIGHT THIS TIME ""
Fine , now explain how that's not going to end up right where we are again?
thanks
bye bye now
PS: What I'm ultimately getting at is govt is NOT THE SOLUTION.
No way to administer such a program without a large entity which would have the same issues at government in the end, with just as little accountability. The best one can hopeful is that at least if it is at the state level, it can't get out of control too easily as people can leave the state and go to a better run state. That competition would, one would hope, keep balance in check.
I'm assuming your way is no social safety net whatsoever? Let everyone die of starvation, etc., and just let the poor have at one another?
:eek: