Question for Grob/Hershey...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from swingtrader123:

I just started to read this forum. Unfortunately, there is a lot of unfamilar terms being used, such as "ST". Can some one please tell me what a "ST" is or point to another forum where it is defined? I tried a search, but didn't find any specific mention of "ST". Thanks in advance.

There are three "T's"

they are not conventional as you suggest but they do fit in nicely.

ST is Short Term

IT is intermediate Term

and LT is Long Term

When you get into trading and investing you will find the LT is a break point in txation stuff that politicians thought up for some reason or other.

Get a new search engine as well.
 
Quote from icarus618:

I parsed your post below for clarity.


No argument here, just some clarification and expansion of my earlier comments within the context of your post.


To start, I think nothing negative can be said about entering a trade just in time. Having said that, I don't put any special emphasis on the entry as a person interested in making money. Regardless of entry, taking action when called for is what grows the account. Jack calls this "staying on the right side of the market." I do not see this as being the same as saying "always expect to come out ahead between every action." So in the context of entering on du in anticipation of a bo, the fact of being in the market is not that important as opposed to taking action (which includes holding) when the bo arrives.

With regard to the second part of your statement, whipsaw and FBO, let me begin by saying I take it you see them as a close pair. From my viewpoint, the natural pair is BO and FBO. I would pair the term "whipsaw" with what I call "wtf" because the feelings resulting from them are probably similar, something like "what the fuck just happened I took a trade based on what I saw and what I've seen in the past and it didn't do what I expected it to do and I lost money, damn." Well, I know FBO is always on the table. I know all FBOs require action, which is not a hold. Whipsaw and wtf feelings do not belong on the table labeled "Making Money."


Alright, I might have thrown a curve with my reference to failure to pt 3. I put that amongst the World Trading Federation experiences. But let's look closer at the FP3. A failure to pt 3 is a BO. It is a BO from a DU where a person may have had expectations for a new trend but instead got a continuation of the current trend. So in that sense, an FP3 is just a misreading of the current trend and in and of itself does not exist. In any case, the point is still the same. A BO requires action, which includes holding if I'm in the market during DU.


I'm not sure if I get what you mean here. Where a person's stop is or whether a loss results are, to me, irrelevant to an FBO. An FBO is always on the table with a BO.


Yes we operate on different fractals, but trading "loose" is relative to the operating fractal, is it not? You don't mention what bar duration you operate on.


Yes, certainly, looking closer gives a heads up. The important thing is to take action when called for, whether looking within the bar or at it.


Look at bar 55 following the BO on 54 as being illustrative of an indication. Also compare that series with what followed the BO on 68.


No comment, other than to say successful learning is the only way.


Happy New Year.

Super post and commentary.

Happy New Year.
 
Thanks for the charts txuk!

Could anybody explain this for me in simple words, it comes from the preflight check:

B. Volume is/is not scalloped and working for yesterday. If not didn't get am/pm side of scallop yesterday. All market indicator volumes were _________ ysterday. Expect today to be like _______with ______volume start up. Note news driving volume:


The word scallop makes it impossible for me to comprehend, I´ve looked it up in a dictionary but I still don´t get it.

/stalker
 
One great effect of listening to the tapes is seeing how relaxed Jack is about the whole thing. In the past I was trying to overcomplicate the prv thing. I have switched to Jacks simple calculations every 30 seconds. Nothing to it.

Stalker

I have not read the post your quoting I guess as I have not seen that term used. Scallops are delicious but not sure how they apply to trading. Can you give me a link to your source.
 
I think I got it from listening to one of the tapes. When jack talks about scallops he means the formation of volume between am- dryout - pm.

Is Jack actually trading mini-sp500 on the tapes? I just listened to two of the tapes from september together with the charts from txuk, and they didn´t match.


Easyrider - have you tried to have a 30-second chart up that shows volume only? I prefere to use a timer, but you´re used to look at more finetune stuff and it´s very simple to just multiply the values with ten from a 30-sec chart. Made me too jumpy though so I don´t know, just an idea...
 
I wasn´t sober when I said I was gonna post charts with my trades, but I guess I have to keep a promise. :)

I´m gonna trade most days this month, sometimes half the day, sometimes the whole day. I trade my dads account, so don´t worry about my economy, but mentally it hurts the same. If my old man says stop or if I feel that I can´t handle real money I will switch to the simulator but continue to post charts with papertrades.

I hope that people in this thread can comment on what I do wrong, it would be helpfull for me and probably for others to. Especially comments from people who follow the markets live and see things that I miss.


I´m only gonna trade retracements. That´s it. I study a lot of stuff that Jack teaches, but I´m only looking for 0-4 trades a day.


Traded AM only today. This morning I saw two retracements. Unfortunately I was on the phone with grandma when the trend resumed at 10.20 and missed that trade.
The second retracement was taking much longer time, but volume was falling and I thought the bottom from last week was gonna be tested again so I entered at the 11.10 bar at 1253,75. Turned out I was wrong and my entry was at a new point 3. Out for -1,25p. The market moved so quick so I wasn´t able to wash, but maybe I hesitated a little too long.

I can usually spot what I do wrong, but here I´m not really sure. Maybe I should have waited a little longer, was my entry to aggressive?

Thanx,
Stalker
 

Attachments

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top