It doesn't matter if they are fudged added to subtracted multiplied or divided. All the temps are going up. Except the stratosphere which is going down as theory predicts. And the ice is melting.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Prediction: Losing election simply due to climate scepticism
- Thread starter OddTrader
- Start date
It doesn't matter if they are fudged added to subtracted multiplied or divided. All the temps are going up. Except the stratosphere which is going down as theory predicts. And the ice is melting.
Sea levels have risen hundred of feet since the Americas were settled via the Beringia land bridge with Asia. It didn't end humanity. We could live with a few flooded living rooms in Venice and a couple of Pacific islands disappearing if we had to. It's been a warm December on the East Coast, I've enjoyed running outdoors instead of on a treadmill.
The Earth is constantly being hit with icy meteors. That probably raises sea levels over time as well.
Global warming is probably the invention of some policy wonk, and like any good political scheme there's something in it for a lot of different interest groups on both sides of the aisle and internationally where it counts. One of the goals is probably to prevent a resource war as India and China continue to rise.
They just love to sell things with lies, even when the truth might work.
No global warming is not " an invention of some policy wonk". That is an idiotic thing to say. Conservative?
See.....CO2 is greenhouse gas and.....................oh fuk it nevermind.
I would also mention that raw temperature data that formerly freely available on the web for download a few years ago is now secret and unavailable.
Bullcrap.
Bullcrap.
Well then.... please publish the url what contains the raw historic data from temperature reporting stations for download.
I would be happy to have it.
Well then.... please publish the url what contains the raw historic data from temperature reporting stations for download.
I would be happy to have it.
Why, so you could put on a y scale of a thousand degrees and make it flat liar?
Why, so you could put on a y scale of a thousand degrees and make it flat liar?
So you admit that raw temperature data from reporting stations is no longer available for download on the web, eh?
So you admit that raw temperature data from reporting stations is no longer available for download on the web, eh?
I actually don't know. But if it was you would use a y scale of one million to make it look perfectly flat. Because you are essentially a liar.
I actually don't know. But if it was you would use a y scale of one million to make it look perfectly flat. Because you are essentially a liar.
If you assert the raw temperature data from reporting stations is still available then post the url to the source. Otherwise everyone knows I am correct and you are wrong. It is that simple.
If you assert the raw temperature data from reporting stations is still available then post the url to the source. Otherwise everyone knows I am correct and you are wrong. It is that simple.
So you can make a flat lying chart.
Seems you're now too late. Looks like it's been published.
Keep up your spirit for the fight of whatever you really want, if you still want to!
Maybe you definitely should upload your previously downloaded data on the Internet to the public for further study, after checking copyright and permission with the source provider.
Good luck!
Q
http://www.argo.ucsd.edu/global_change_analysis.html
Ocean temperature and heat content
Over the past 50 years, the oceans have absorbed more than 80% of the total heat added to the air/sea/land/cyrosphere climate system (Levitus et al, 2005). As the dominant reservoir for heat, the oceans are critical for measuring the radiation imbalance of the planet and the surface layer of the oceans plays the role of thermostat and heat source/sink for the lower atmosphere.
Levitus et al 2012, recently, and Domingues et al (2008) and Levitus et al (2009) previously, have estimated the multi-decadal upper ocean heat content using best-known corrections to systematic errors in the fall rate of expendable bathythermographs (Wijffels et al, 2008). For the upper 700m, the increase in heat content was 24 x 1022 J (±2.S.E.) since 1955. This is consistent with the comparison by Roemmich and Gilson (2009) of Argo data with the global temperature time-series of Levitus et al (2005), finding a warming of the 0 - 2000 m ocean by 0.06°C since the (pre-XBT) early 1960's.
UQ
Keep up your spirit for the fight of whatever you really want, if you still want to!
Maybe you definitely should upload your previously downloaded data on the Internet to the public for further study, after checking copyright and permission with the source provider.
Good luck!
Q
http://www.argo.ucsd.edu/global_change_analysis.html
Ocean temperature and heat content
Over the past 50 years, the oceans have absorbed more than 80% of the total heat added to the air/sea/land/cyrosphere climate system (Levitus et al, 2005). As the dominant reservoir for heat, the oceans are critical for measuring the radiation imbalance of the planet and the surface layer of the oceans plays the role of thermostat and heat source/sink for the lower atmosphere.
Levitus et al 2012, recently, and Domingues et al (2008) and Levitus et al (2009) previously, have estimated the multi-decadal upper ocean heat content using best-known corrections to systematic errors in the fall rate of expendable bathythermographs (Wijffels et al, 2008). For the upper 700m, the increase in heat content was 24 x 1022 J (±2.S.E.) since 1955. This is consistent with the comparison by Roemmich and Gilson (2009) of Argo data with the global temperature time-series of Levitus et al (2005), finding a warming of the 0 - 2000 m ocean by 0.06°C since the (pre-XBT) early 1960's.
UQ
So the ARGO website fully confirms my assertions. Good to know.
http://judithcurry.com/2013/09/26/the-relentless-increase-of-ocean-heat/
"Well, Lubos Motl has done the arithmetic in this post Ocean heat content: relentless but negligible. This is a good post, check it out. The punchline of his calculations: the heating in the layer 0-2000 m translates to 0.065 C +/- 20%. His calculations are essentially confirmed from this ARGO page where they confirm that since the 1960s, the warming of that layer was 0.06 °C.
So, can anyone figure out why 0.06C is a big deal for the climate? Or how all that heat that is apparently well mixed in the ocean could somehow get into the atmosphere and influence weather/temperatures/rainfall on the land? Or is sequestering heat in the ocean a fortuitous ‘solution’ to the global (surface) warming problem?"