Possible Election Fraud in Progress

During the Impeachment trail, Schiff went to extremes protecting the identity of the “whistleblower” - so much importance was given to an anonymous source.

Fast forward to today, there’s several people stepping forward, under oath, giving testimony...... but these brave “whistleblowers” are muted in the MSM, ridiculed publicly and threatened privately.

Its because they have no evidence. I saw sumting! bla bla in a country packed with Trump's liars and crazies?

You are being scammed into filling his coffers. He gets pleasure from suckers, especially loyal suckers.
 
During the Impeachment trail, Schiff went to extremes protecting the identity of the “whistleblower” - so much importance was given to an anonymous source.

Fast forward to today, there’s several people stepping forward, under oath, giving testimony...... but these brave “whistleblowers” are muted in the MSM, ridiculed publicly and threatened privately.
I suspect that if this were a murder trial, these sworn affidavits and witnesses would well lead to a conviction.
 
Given that these witnesses only have what they saw, what they were told or what they heard and have no access to review the ballots and investigators have not (yet) had access to the various machines to probe them, what would suffice as evidence in your opinion? Some have physically written down names and addresses which turned out to be vacant lots and churches which negate those votes. How is that not evidence of fraudulent voting?

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


True .... but at some point you need......evidence...

You are telling me what you heard someone say....which would be easy to verify and put in front of a judge. A judge threw out plenty of affidavits for various errors I believe.

Again....when someone tells me they have clear evidence of fraud..the evidence should clearly show that fraud resulted in an entire state of millions of votes going one way and not the other.

Evidence of some incorrect ballots which were caught is not evidence the entire results were wrong.
 
Compared to the anonymous hearsay evidence presented in the impeachment trial? Got it.


Then you agree both cases have hearsay uncorraberated evidence and should come to the same conclusion that no collusion, coercement or fraud and Trump was not convicted Biden won the election.
 
Then you agree both cases have hearsay uncorraberated evidence and should come to the same conclusion that no collusion, coercement or fraud and Trump was not convicted Biden won the election.
You're clearly biased and don't want to see the truth. Please discontinue your garbage postings.
 
Then you agree both cases have hearsay uncorraberated evidence and should come to the same conclusion that no collusion, coercement or fraud and Trump was not convicted Biden won the election.

Liberals touted 24/7 the importance of an anonymous individuals testimony, unable to identify or cross examine, unsubstantiated by physical evidence. But when people, under oath and penalty of perjury, the same Liberals turn a blind eye, disregarding their testimony and better yet threaten the witnesses when they come forward.

Just pointing out Liberal hypocrisy.
 
Liberals touted 24/7 the importance of an anonymous individuals testimony, unable to identify or cross examine, unsubstantiated by physical evidence. But when people, under oath and penalty of perjury, the same Liberals turn a blind eye, disregarding their testimony and better yet threaten the witnesses when they come forward.

Just pointing out Liberal hypocrisy.


Thank you for following into the hypocrisy trap...

FROM JANUARY 2020 IMPEACHEMNT
Democrats have pushed Republicans to at least call for more evidence. At the beginning of the trial, they put forward eight proposals to subpoena various witnesses or documents the administration has refused to turn over. All were voted down along party lines. However, another vote on subpoenas will take place next week.

But several Republicans said Saturday they are more convinced than ever that it is not necessary to issue new subpoenas. Sen. Ron Johnson said he saw no need whatsoever to call witnesses.


4os7t8.jpg
 
Also people provided affidavits of what they believe and heard....people who are stout Trump supporters...not independent 3rd party witnesses.

Don't murderers bring up defense witnesses who testify they beleive their friend, father, brother etc.. could never do the crime he is accused of...even after the evidence says otherwise.

HEARSAY = Bullshit
 
Back
Top