Possible Election Fraud in Progress

A lot of Leftist Idiots don't understand that when judges dismiss court cases right at the outset claiming "no standing" etc, then they are denying discovery. That means that no evidence or witnesses are introduced and heard in the case. Tomorrow in Nevada, you will hear live witnesses and evidence finally in a courtroom at noon.
 
Given that these witnesses only have what they saw, what they were told or what they heard and have no access to review the ballots and investigators have not (yet) had access to the various machines to probe them, what would suffice as evidence in your opinion? Some have physically written down names and addresses which turned out to be vacant lots and churches which negate those votes. How is that not evidence of fraudulent voting?

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

How about the hundreds who applied for ballots and used a post office box as their address and all at the same post office box? I cannot imagine how all of them can fit in that tiny post office box? There is a paper trail and someone who owns that post office box is one of the culprits to mass election fraud. That is a no brainer. Yes, there is a lot of evidence and ordinary people who have no reason to lie have even executed affidavits to support their statements.
 
witnesses and evidence
Can't See what you Won't Watch
proxy-image

There, that's much better!
Do Not Confuse Me With The Facts!
Thank you.
 
I have reviewed the tweets of several prominent Republican leaders since November 2nd, 2020.

I wanted to get an idea what their thoughts were regarding the contested 2020 US Presidential Election. The vast majority of these Republican leaders have been silent on this matter, except many tweeted on November 6th along the lines of “All legal votes should count”. Particularly noteworthy was the absence of Pence tweets in regards to thoughts of election malfeasance.

Rudy Giuliani’s tweets contain significant information on what is going on and who the other players are.

Steve Scalise’s and particularly Kevin McCarthy’s tweets will warm a Republican’s heart.

The following Twitter account holders’ tweets were reviewed:

@PeteSessions
@GovChristie
@Senatemajldr (Mitch McConnell)
@VP (Mike Pence)
@SenJohnThune
@SteveScalise
@GopLeader (Kevin McCarthy)
@RudyGiuliani

I would have expected more support for Trump by some of these prominent Republican leaders. What this may suggest, I will leave to you.
 
I have reviewed the tweets of several prominent Republican leaders since November 2nd, 2020.

I wanted to get an idea what their thoughts were regarding the contested 2020 US Presidential Election. The vast majority of these Republican leaders have been silent on this matter, except many tweeted on November 6th along the lines of “All legal votes should count”. Particularly noteworthy was the absence of Pence tweets in regards to thoughts of election malfeasance.

Rudy Giuliani’s tweets contain significant information on what is going on and who the other players are.

Steve Scalise’s and particularly Kevin McCarthy’s tweets will warm a Republican’s heart.

The following Twitter account holders’ tweets were reviewed:

@PeteSessions
@GovChristie
@Senatemajldr (Mitch McConnell)
@VP (Mike Pence)
@SenJohnThune
@SteveScalise
@GopLeader (Kevin McCarthy)
@RudyGiuliani

I would have expected more support for Trump by some of these prominent Republican leaders. What this may suggest, I will leave to you.

that trump is batshit crazy and republicans are walking a fine line of managing their careers in a post Trump world (where it is unclear how much influence trump will have)
 
Given that these witnesses only have what they saw, what they were told or what they heard and have no access to review the ballots and investigators have not (yet) had access to the various machines to probe them, what would suffice as evidence in your opinion? Some have physically written down names and addresses which turned out to be vacant lots and churches which negate those votes. How is that not evidence of fraudulent voting?

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

No education, you just spout phrases and "facts" you hear on conservative shows without understanding don't you little fella?

Jingoistic debate trope of the religious right. The mechanisms of voting do not prevent bad ballots (assuming these few even exist) being inserted by Trumpists..? Oh!

Remember now, the absence of evidence that Trump's supporters have not sent in strange ballots to be found, is not evidence they did not. :) Proof of trumpist deception on a grand scale!

 
Last edited:
During the Impeachment trail, Schiff went to extremes protecting the identity of the “whistleblower” - so much importance was given to an anonymous source.

Fast forward to today, there’s several people stepping forward, under oath, giving testimony...... but these brave “whistleblowers” are muted in the MSM, ridiculed publicly and threatened privately.
 
During the Impeachment trail, Schiff went to extremes protecting the identity of the “whistleblower” - so much importance was given to an anonymous source.

Fast forward to today, there’s several people stepping forward, under oath, giving testimony...... but these brave “whistleblowers” are muted in the MSM, ridiculed publicly and threatened privately.
It's called Pravda.
 
Back
Top