POLL: The repercussions of a US attack on Iraq

Which of these is most likely?

  • Co-ordinated large-scale bombings of shopping malls and offices (similar to September 11, but not us

    Votes: 12 133.3%
  • Biological attacks on schools, malls, airports etc

    Votes: 5 55.6%
  • Highly co-ordinated machine gun mow-downs of crowds by suicide gangs

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • One person suicide bombings (similar to that carried out by Hamas) co-ordinated across numerous smal

    Votes: 30 333.3%
  • Devastating car bombs set to go off amongst traffic queues of commuters crawling into work in the ru

    Votes: 3 33.3%
  • It won't be as obvious as any of the above, but it will make September 11 look like a wasp bite com

    Votes: 26 288.9%
  • No repercussions

    Votes: 95 1,055.6%

  • Total voters
    9
Quote from freealways:

Well what do you know, everyone, yes EVERYONE was caught napping. :D

When Msfe posted the article (on page 293) titled 'United they fall' which also mentions 'Richard Perle', everyone automatically turned off and obviously didn't bother to read the article seeing that it was posted by mentally handicapped Msfe.

The article is actually, surprise, surprise, making a case that the UN is an abject failure and that the present type of intervention is the world's chance to right things.

Do you see Msfe that long winded articles don't serve a purpose (especially the articles handpicked by you) other than making everyone fall asleep.

On the other hand, Msfe too appears to be in automatic pilot mode as he adopted the article without bothering to read it, obviously thinking it would automatically support his own cause.

Or is it that Msfe has thought the better of it and prefers to now be on the winning side ?

I for one would prefer not to rub shoulders with the likes of Msfe.

freealways
On the money, freealways:

[size=-1]"This new century now challenges the hopes for a new world order in new ways. We will not defeat or even contain fanatical terror unless we can carry the war to the territories from which it is launched. This will sometimes require that we use force against states that harbour terrorists, as we did in destroying the Taleban regime in Afghanistan.

The chronic failure of the Security Council to enforce its own resolutions — 17 of them with respect to Iraq, the most recent, 1441, a resolution of last resort — is unmistakable: it is simply not up to the task.

We are left with coalitions of the willing. Far from disparaging them as a threat to a new world order, we should recognise that they are, by default, the best hope for that order, and the true alternative to the anarchy of the abject failure of the United Nations."[/size]


Article is completely pro-war against Iraq and others like her. Does Wild/msfe read the stuff he pastes or is he a complete idiot? I think it's a twofer, he's guilty of both.
 
Quote from msfe:

you´ll never get it, Maxigirl - told you before
First, let me comment on "Maxigirl." Do you have a habit of calling males, girls?

Now, on to this ridiculous statement: "you´ll never get it" That's an easy way to not have to explain yourself. But let's just go on the stuff you're promoting, for example, you posted:

"We will not defeat or even contain fanatical terror unless we can carry the war to the territories from which it is launched."

Tell you what, I think I get this statement you posted a hundred percent.

"This will sometimes require that we use force against states that harbour terrorists, as we did in destroying the Taliban regime in Afghanistan."

Right on, Wild/msfe, I agree with this opinion that you posted.

"The chronic failure of the Security Council to enforce its own resolutions — 17 of them with respect to Iraq, the most recent, 1441, a resolution of last resort — is unmistakable: it is simply not up to the task."

Again, I agree with you; F*UCK the UN. At least until it's revamped.

"We are left with coalitions of the willing. Far from disparaging them as a threat to a new world order, we should recognise that they are, by default, the best hope for that order, and the true alternative to the anarchy of the abject failure of the United Nations."

No argument from me, Wild/msfe. Power to The Coalition of the Willing, which obviously must include you; you posted it.
 
Quote from dgabriel:

I'd like to strap that bony bitch to the underbelly of an A10 warthog and strafe an Iraqi column.
Bony? She's a hottie:
screencaps.jpg
 
Quote from dgabriel:

I'd like to strap that bony bitch to the underbelly of an A10 warthog and strafe an Iraqi column.
Please hold that impulse. Her column was right on the mark!:)
 
Msfe said "you´ll never get it, Maxigirl - told you before"

Max, what he is in fact saying is 'I am a poof and I would like to get into your pants.

Gee, half your luck Max t :D :D :D
Lucky bastard :D


freealways
 
Back
Top