On the money, freealways:Quote from freealways:
Well what do you know, everyone, yes EVERYONE was caught napping.![]()
When Msfe posted the article (on page 293) titled 'United they fall' which also mentions 'Richard Perle', everyone automatically turned off and obviously didn't bother to read the article seeing that it was posted by mentally handicapped Msfe.
The article is actually, surprise, surprise, making a case that the UN is an abject failure and that the present type of intervention is the world's chance to right things.
Do you see Msfe that long winded articles don't serve a purpose (especially the articles handpicked by you) other than making everyone fall asleep.
On the other hand, Msfe too appears to be in automatic pilot mode as he adopted the article without bothering to read it, obviously thinking it would automatically support his own cause.
Or is it that Msfe has thought the better of it and prefers to now be on the winning side ?
I for one would prefer not to rub shoulders with the likes of Msfe.
freealways
[size=-1]"This new century now challenges the hopes for a new world order in new ways. We will not defeat or even contain fanatical terror unless we can carry the war to the territories from which it is launched. This will sometimes require that we use force against states that harbour terrorists, as we did in destroying the Taleban regime in Afghanistan.
The chronic failure of the Security Council to enforce its own resolutions â 17 of them with respect to Iraq, the most recent, 1441, a resolution of last resort â is unmistakable: it is simply not up to the task.
We are left with coalitions of the willing. Far from disparaging them as a threat to a new world order, we should recognise that they are, by default, the best hope for that order, and the true alternative to the anarchy of the abject failure of the United Nations."[/size]
Article is completely pro-war against Iraq and others like her. Does Wild/msfe read the stuff he pastes or is he a complete idiot? I think it's a twofer, he's guilty of both.
