Police Lied -- Mike Brown Was Killed 148 Feet Away from Darren Wilson's SUV

You have yet to answer the question, but we'll come back to it when the trial takes place.

Your question isn't a question, its a presumption that is incorrect.

Here I'll demonstrate for you. Have you stopped beating your wife? Try answering that. See how that works?

Next.
 
I'm not inferring anything. I'm suggesting yet again that those who want to know the law in this regard rather than spew unfounded opinions do a little googling re the SCOTUS decision. If you don't want to do that, then don't.

I am fully aware of the SCOTUS decision.

Oh, was Michael Brown shot in the back?

I will just post it right here for your dumb ass.

Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)[1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that under the Fourth Amendment, when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, he or she may use deadly force to prevent escape only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.

Why in the hell is proximity to the car relevant? According to the grand jury testimony, Brown "continuosly came forward in the charging motion".
 
Actually, regarding the "murder" attempt, the presumption is on your part.

Incorrect. Is was a determination of the GJ that lead to the conclusion that Wilson acted lawfully.
Literally it was the determination that allowed Wilson to employ lethal force.

I'm an open-minded person but you have to do better than a false presumption followed by recursive logic.

That dog don't hunt.
 
Are you serious? What is the difference between "toward" and "away"?

Where the hell did you go to school?

Read the top sentence you dumb ass. Didn't realize you were that stupid and needed your hand held every step of the way.

test8_zpsb84b5360.png
 
I am fully aware of the SCOTUS decision.

Oh, was Michael Brown shot in the back?

I will just post it right here for your dumb ass.



Why in the hell is proximity to the car relevant? According to the grand jury testimony, Brown "continuosly came forward in the charging motion".

Proximity to the car in and of itself is not particularly relevant. What is relevant is that he was chasing him. He would not have to chase him unless he was fleeing.

This is really difficult for you, isn't it?
 
Incorrect. Is was a determination of the GJ that lead to the conclusion that Wilson acted lawfully.
Literally it was the determination that allowed Wilson to employ lethal force.

I'm an open-minded person but you have to do better than a false presumption followed by recursive logic.

That dog don't hunt.

And was the GJ there to see whether or not Brown attempted to "murder" Wilson?

Again, who other than Wilson says that Brown tried to "murder" him? (The guys back at the station and those who heard about it over the grapevine don't count.)
 
Proximity to the car in and of itself is not particularly relevant. What is relevant is that he was chasing him. He would not have to chase him unless he was fleeing.

This is really difficult for you, isn't it?

You stated it perfectly. He "was fleeing" and then stopped fleeing turned around and then "he ran towards the officer full charge" according to grand jury testimony.
 
You stated it perfectly. He "was fleeing" and then stopped fleeing turned around and then "he ran towards the officer full charge" according to grand jury testimony.

And the SCOTUS says what about firing at someone who is fleeing?
 
You stated it perfectly. He "was fleeing" and then stopped fleeing turned around and then "he ran towards the officer full charge" according to grand jury testimony.

You do realize you're arguing with someone who is clinically insane, right? You're never going to convince him, and he's just going to go on whining about the Grand jury's decision, but that's all it is - whining. He'll get over it when he's exhausted every angle ten times over and no one wants to listen anymore.

The internet is his only social outlet.
 
Back
Top