Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry

Buy1Sell2 said:
Quite the opposite----Rather, I would encourage the removal of a president who had committed high crimes or misdemeanors. But, this one has not. There really isn't any need generally for impeachment since we have elections every 4 years. Monarchs are not subject to elections. What the Idiot Dems are doing is destructive to America at it's core and they have opened the door for every president now to be impeached.
More...
such mentality enables any president regardless of their party affiliation to run for 4 years without any consequences or checks and balances. power like that is reckless and extremely dangerous even for 4 years as demonstrated by our current one.
 
constitutionman said:
such mentality enables any president regardless of their party affiliation to run for 4 years without any consequences or checks and balances. power like that is reckless and extremely dangerous even for 4 years as demonstrated by our current one.
More...
Yeah-----no, it's not. Election every 4 years and Congreff and Judiciary actions during the 4 year term are massive checks and balances. He is exposing the Left for what they are and is conducting successful policy administration and for this he must be removed with impeachment process.
 
Many will argue that these Senators- especially Rand Paul- are just spinning their wheels and just asking again and have Roberts reject or edit it is a waste of time.

Nope. I believe the opposite. There will be a vote this week on whether to have witnesses. The republicans should take every opportunity to give them fair warning whether that will go if they make a poor decision. Ditto for the Biden Syndicate.


Rand Paul to 'insist' on whistleblower question blocked by John Roberts

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate...histleblower-question-blocked-by-john-roberts
 
Buy1Sell2 said:
It will end tomorrow.
More...

If just one Democrat Senator flips be it Feinstein, Manchin, Sinema, Collins, that should be enough to nullify the vote for witnesses by RINO liberals Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and Mitt Romney. $32 million wasted by Democrats and probably, closer to $50 million by now. That is one more good reason to end this impeachment trial charade of the Democrats.
 
jem said:
do you know who glenn greenwald is?
you should come up to speed before you cast asperisions. ...


https://theintercept.com/2017/01/11...-elect-using-unverified-claims-as-dems-cheer/

Glenn Greenwald
January 11 2017, 6:35 a.m.


IN JANUARY 1961, .......

... more at link..
More...
LOL so the deep state throw their vast resources behind Shillary ... and she lost.

BTW Greenwald was born in Queens, NY just like Dump (and me as well o_O) I say they are in cahoots. Somebody needs to get to the bottom of it. Might a deeeeeper state brewing.
 
Optionpro007 said:
Radical liberals are so blood thirsty for power they will take the whole country down and let it burn if they don't get what they want. See Venezuela for a clear and present danger example.

Radical liberals should never be allowed to be in power again. They should be relegated to being 'community organizers' forever.

For the love of this country, say NO, to radical liberals!
More...
Dump before he ran as a Republican just a few years back was a life long Dem ... who favored Woman's Choice, Gun Control and ObamaCare who even praised Shillary.

As for Venezuela we are headed there as soon as the impeachment charade is in the rear view mirror.
GeneralDump.png
 
Collins is a yes on witnesses.

Lamar Alexander is a no.

Based on their own released statements, not speculation.

I believe that puts the projected tally into the no camp. Not sure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top