Omicron: Natural immunity idea ‘not really panning out'

I didn't refuse to read, I said "show me specifically what you want me to read". That's how it works. I say "source" and you provide a source.

When you ask me "source", I don't link to google and say "go read". That's what the GWB_NPC (and apparently you) do.

The end part of the thread has dozens of links that provide what you have asked for. I copied four for you.
 
First of all, I work from home so I don't come in contact with a lot of people to begin with. If I feel like I'm getting sick I put myself on lockdown, which means I don't even leave the house for two weeks. Period. And that's something I've always done... long before Covid ever came along. I think anyone who willingly goes out in public while they are sick with something contagious is quite frankly an asshole.
Reader-------the above section of Baron's posting is one of the greatest points to be made concerning this or any other virus. It's right on. It's personal responsibility.
 
Your first three sentences, my emphasis for clarity:

But you agree you can spread if you caught it, especially asymptomatically, and you dont have a choice who you spread it to. I dont push any vax politics on anyone but when people want everyone around them to be as lax with their health protocols as they are, then you are spreading the same hypocrisy.

It is like a smoker who has no fear of lung cancer demanding to be able to smoke in front of people and telling them to get over it.


yeah my post is not about vaccines..... stop your hate for me and read what I wrote.... the word vaccine does not mean the post is about vaccines.
 
Yeah... and we will provide the links and three days you will be back demanding they be provided again. Your act is getting old.

Not at all. Please show a case where you have provided any link on specific data and I've done the same thing 3 days later.

What has happened was that you have provided a link, I have disputed it and you tried to ignore my dispute and claim it was "proven science". If you ignore and don't settle the debate, you don't get to continue using it as an example. It is still flawed. As I've said dozens of times, you have issues with critical thinking.
 
The end part of the thread has dozens of links that provide what you have asked for. I copied four for you.

And I gave you a rebuttal for the four you provided. You can either respond to the rebuttal or provide more data. You don't get to pretend what you said is the truth while ignoring my objections. That's not how discourse works.
 
yeah my post is not about vaccines..... stop your hate for me and read what I wrote.... the word vaccine does not mean the post is about vaccines.

I don't waste my time hating you, man. But say what you mean. If there is a misunderstanding, just say so and clarify.

Stop your hate for me.
 
Tsing Tao is the kind of redhat who'd get a common cold, claim COVID and not get tested to avoid raising his new hero's DeathSentence's numbers, let's be honest.

I tested twice with an at-home kit, both time positive. Same with the wife. Twice. I did not go to an official testing site.

Of course, you'll never hear this because you're too cowardly to engage - just post from behind the curtain of ignore :)
 
I don't waste my time hating you, man. But say what you mean. If there is a misunderstanding, just say so and clarify.

Stop your hate for me.


It was pretty clear what I said just re read it, if not then let it go. I clarified for Baron even.
 
Back
Top