Pence. Good one.![]()
Ah, you think they remove Trump and Pence at the same time in some special sorcery they cast in congress, is that it?
Pence. Good one.![]()
Ah, you think they remove Trump and Pence at the same time in some special sorcery they cast in congress, is that it?
I'm saying he's as much of a crazy as Trump, just more subdued in his insanity:Ah, you think they remove Trump and Pence at the same time in some special sorcery they cast in congress, is that it?
I'm saying he's as much of a crazy as Trump, just more subdued in his insanity:
http://www.upworthy.com/20-things-mike-pence-did-while-you-werent-looking-and-why-it-matters
https://www.thenation.com/article/why-mike-pence-is-worse-than-donald-trump/
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/01/gods-plan-for-mike-pence/546569/
And while you're convinced Pence will necessarily be at the helm if Trump is removed, I wouldn't count on a Pence theocracy just yet if I were you. I won't pretend to know how it would play out, but in the off chance that Trump had a hand in subversive activities to gain the presidency, I don't see how his ever-willing yes-man would necessarily stand to benefit. Fruit from the poisonous tree, so to speak. Not exactly a suitable legal metaphor in this case, but you get the idea. I'm just suggesting that these are uncertain times.
Stop with the repetitive babbling.
Horowitz has precisely the authority I outlined. No more and no less. That is why he is the IG and why Sessions had to appoint Huber- an actual DOJ prosecutor- to deal with or develop a response to probable or actual criminal matters.
As I have said twice, I see your gig. You are positioning yourself in advance to be able to say that no criminal matters or finding came out of the IG report as though that is conclusive or definitive. It is not. He does not have that authority. Sorry to interrupt your little plan but it is not going to work, not that you won't have a shot at it anyway. The IG is not a substitute for a real investigation- period. He has a lot of work ahead that he needs to do in regard to moving strzrok, ohr, page, and others out and that is fine but not a substitute for criminal investigation.
And yes, wrongdoing in regard to the dossier etc extends to other agencies and parties in government and out of government such as fusion, gps etc. - beyond the personnel/administration powers of the IG. That sounds conspiratorial to you, in the same way that wrongdoing by McCabe and FBI agents and corrupted FISA court proceedings and dem contributions to the chief investigator sounded conspiratorial to you- and probably still do. But your beliefs are not important or controlling.
You remember McCabe, right?
If it makes you feel any better, I think you're a quack, too. A big one.There's no way to say this without sounding offensive, so I'll just apologize and say that you, Freddie, calling someone crazy or insane is actually a vote of confidence in my opinion based on how your political alignment leans.

If it makes you feel any better, I think you're a quack, too. A big one.
![]()
And if there is further investigation - as an example- of McCabe's role in approving the dossier, then the IG has no power to investigate him because he is no longer an employee, and even if he were still an employee, the IG has not authority to investigate the people he was interacting with outside of the department if legal process is required.
And in regard to my being for the IG report "going in a way that you don’t expect," would you mind articulating to me what I do and do not expect since you obviously believe you know better than I do?
You and me both.If you told me I made sense, I'd start to worry.