Noted Hacker Makes Explosive Claims About DNC WikiLeaks

I am confused about what exactly Fox News "withdrew?" As quoted above, their reporting cited a confidential source, identified as a "federal investigator." Did they actually get it from him or are they relying on hearsay about what a federal investigator told someone else? That is a huge distinction. Otherwise, I don't see why they would withdraw it, unless maybe they suspected the federal investigator was somehow bogus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jem
This would be like Ron Goldman's dad asking OJ's best friend to be his PR person - presuming Al Cowling had reputation as dirty as Brock's.



lets review...
the dnc did not let the fbi investigate the crime? why how?
instead democrat donor connected crowd strike did the investigation
the intelligence agencies signed off on the memo with the sort of caveats that would make anyone with a brain question what happened.

then it turns out the software that was said to be indicative of russian involvement also could have been cia software that the cia recently lost control of into the public domain.
(thereby making that whole conclusion that russian did it near worthless)

this dnc worker Seth Rich guy is murdered but nothing is stolen
Assange heavily hinted Rich was the source of the leaks of the clinton emails

now the family is being represented by brock who works for the clintons... you know Hillary clinton... whose emails were leaked...

And that does not impact you...





It's almost like Seth Rich was a Democrat, his family is Democrat and are tied to another Democrats.

Someone investigate this BOMBSHELL.

Frickin morons.
 
Last edited:
the dnc did not let the fbi investigate the crime? why how?

Lie number 1

https://www.buzzfeed.com/alimwatkin...uter-servers?utm_term=.aymE1DGpBr#.lsbDYvN846

instead democrat donor connected crowd strike did the investigation

Huh? Crowdstrike was HIRED by DNC, what donor?

the intelligence agencies signed off on the memo with the sort of caveats that would make anyone with a brain question what happened.

No caveats, they said in certain terms that Russians hacked

then it turns out the software that was said to be indicative of russian involvement also could have been cia software that the cia recently lost control of into the public domain.
(thereby making that whole conclusion that russian did it near worthless)

Bullshit, what has the CIA s/w got to do with the DNC hacking

this dnc worker Seth Rich guy is murdered but nothing is stolen

It was a BOTCHED robbery, police report said he had defensive wounds and his watch was damaged.
Assange heavily hinted Rich was the source of the leaks of the clinton emails

'HINT' lol
now the family is being represented by brock who works for the clintons... you know Hillary clinton... whose emails were leaked...

Biggest lie of them all.

The Bauman foundation has absolutely no record of Brad being on their board, just because there are other Bauman's doesn't make them the same one.

And that does not impact you...

Yes, because you are not good at fact checking or critical thinking. You swallow right wing propaganda without any filter and then vomit it here as facts.
 
Last edited:
I am confused about what exactly Fox News "withdrew?" As quoted above, their reporting cited a confidential source, identified as a "federal investigator." Did they actually get it from him or are they relying on hearsay about what a federal investigator told someone else? That is a huge distinction. Otherwise, I don't see why they would withdraw it, unless maybe they suspected the federal investigator was somehow bogus.

Fox News withdrew the ENTIRE story, the part about 'quoted above' doesn't even exist anymore.

Yea, the federal investigator was bogus because FBI denied they were investigating the case OR have a computer to analyze these 'leaks'
 
Wow... you are nuts... so I will just respond to your first point... where you called me a liar... because your source was buzzfeed... over Comey and CNN... and every other news agency I read at the time.


FBI: DNC rebuffed request to examine computer servers

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/

Comey: DNC denied FBI's requests for access to hacked servers

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...-fbi-did-request-access-to-hacked-dnc-servers

The FBI requested direct access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) hacked computer servers but was denied, Director James Comey told lawmakers on Tuesday.

The bureau made “multiple requests at different levels,” according to Comey, but ultimately struck an agreement with the DNC that a “highly respected private company” would get access and share what it found with investigators.

“We’d always prefer to have access hands-on ourselves if that’s possible,” Comey said, noting that he didn’t know why the DNC rebuffed the FBI’s request.
 
FBI: DNC rebuffed request to examine computer servers

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/

First, it relies on ANONYMOUS officials by CNN, how come you are willing to believe that now? LOL

Two, "only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated" - this doesn't bode with YOUR LIE that DNC didn't let investigate the crime

From WIRED

"As The Vergeobserved after consulting with security firms, this arrangement is still business as usual for interactions with law enforcement: private firms conduct the initial study and clear the security threat, while official investigators focus on the actions they should take as a result. And so long as CrowdStrike can supply the raw server data, the FBI doesn't need in-person access to double-check conclusions. Moreover, the FBI was already suspicious of Russian involvement well before CrowdStrike got involved, and had access to information that a private company wouldn't see."

You have to mitigate the threat first and then you let more people in

https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/05/fbi-says-dnc-denied-direct-access-to-servers/

Comey: DNC denied FBI's requests for access to hacked servers

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...-fbi-did-request-access-to-hacked-dnc-servers

The FBI requested direct access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) hacked computer servers but was denied, Director James Comey told lawmakers on Tuesday.

The bureau made “multiple requests at different levels,” according to Comey, but ultimately struck an agreement with the DNC that a “highly respected private company” would get access and share what it found with investigators.

“We’d always prefer to have access hands-on ourselves if that’s possible,” Comey said, noting that he didn’t know why the DNC rebuffed the FBI’s request.

Its quoting the CNN report again, Comey never said DNC denied FBI requests AFTER the mitigation of the hack while CrowdStrike was already on the job.

Details are fundamental
 
you are a so nuts you can't even admit you are wrong... when you are hit in the head by facts...

here is comey... and the hill... detailing how nuts you are. did you read this link... here I will cut and paste it for your rabid dnc troll mind.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...-fbi-did-request-access-to-hacked-dnc-servers



jamescomey_122016getty.jpg

© Getty
The FBI requested direct access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) hacked computer servers but was denied, Director James Comey told lawmakers on Tuesday.

The bureau made “multiple requests at different levels,” according to Comey, but ultimately struck an agreement with the DNC that a “highly respected private company” would get access and share what it found with investigators.

“We’d always prefer to have access hands-on ourselves if that’s possible,” Comey said, noting that he didn’t know why the DNC rebuffed the FBI’s request.



The director was testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee in a rare open session on Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election.
The DNC and the bureau have been quibbling in news reports over whether the FBI asked to examine its servers directly.

The DNC told BuzzFeed in a statement published last week that the FBI never requested access to its servers after they were breached.

But a senior law enforcement official disputed that characterization the following day.

“The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated,” the official said.

“This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third party for information. These actions caused significant delays and inhibited the FBI from addressing the intrusion earlier.”

CrowdStrike, the private security firm in question, has published extensive forensic analysis backing up its assessment that the threat groups that infiltrated the DNC were associated with Russian intelligence.



First, it relies on ANONYMOUS officials by CNN, how come you are willing to believe that now? LOL

Two, "only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated" - this doesn't bode with YOUR LIE that DNC didn't let investigate the crime

From WIRED

"As The Vergeobserved after consulting with security firms, this arrangement is still business as usual for interactions with law enforcement: private firms conduct the initial study and clear the security threat, while official investigators focus on the actions they should take as a result. And so long as CrowdStrike can supply the raw server data, the FBI doesn't need in-person access to double-check conclusions. Moreover, the FBI was already suspicious of Russian involvement well before CrowdStrike got involved, and had access to information that a private company wouldn't see."

You have to mitigate the threat first and then you let more people in

https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/05/fbi-says-dnc-denied-direct-access-to-servers/



Its quoting the CNN report again, Comey never said DNC denied FBI requests AFTER the mitigation of the hack while CrowdStrike was already on the job.

Details are fundamental
 
you are a so nuts you can't even admit you are wrong... when you are hit in the head by facts...

here is comey... and the hill... detailing how nuts you are. did you read this link... here I will cut and paste it for your rabid dnc troll mind.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...-fbi-did-request-access-to-hacked-dnc-servers



jamescomey_122016getty.jpg

© Getty
The FBI requested direct access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) hacked computer servers but was denied, Director James Comey told lawmakers on Tuesday.

The bureau made “multiple requests at different levels,” according to Comey, but ultimately struck an agreement with the DNC that a “highly respected private company” would get access and share what it found with investigators.

“We’d always prefer to have access hands-on ourselves if that’s possible,” Comey said, noting that he didn’t know why the DNC rebuffed the FBI’s request.



The director was testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee in a rare open session on Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election.
The DNC and the bureau have been quibbling in news reports over whether the FBI asked to examine its servers directly.

The DNC told BuzzFeed in a statement published last week that the FBI never requested access to its servers after they were breached.

But a senior law enforcement official disputed that characterization the following day.

“The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated,” the official said.

“This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third party for information. These actions caused significant delays and inhibited the FBI from addressing the intrusion earlier.”

CrowdStrike, the private security firm in question, has published extensive forensic analysis backing up its assessment that the threat groups that infiltrated the DNC were associated with Russian intelligence.

Again - you said DNC didn't let FBI investigate the crime except your own article says that DNC gave FBI unfettered access to CrowdStrike's forensic analysis.

Now don' try to change the subject with ad hominems.
 
you must be paid to write each post of stupidity.
I will take this post as your best attempt at stating you realize you were wrong.

Again - you said DNC didn't let FBI investigate the crime except your own article says that DNC gave FBI unfettered access to CrowdStrike's forensic analysis.

Now don' try to change the subject with ad hominems.
 
Back
Top