Noted Hacker Makes Explosive Claims About DNC WikiLeaks

that is the exact binary stupidity I am talking about.
you could not be waggie. you could be the same person who writes as tony stark becuase this is remarkably similar to his polling arguments.



If I said fox news said Obama stated the sky was red.
And you said he never stated it because the sky is actually blue.
Then I showed you the fox news story in which it says obama says the sky is red.

you would be wrong and
Obama would have been wrong or Fox news would have been wrong.
its possible you all are wrong...

But by virtue of the fact I produced an article stating what I said fox news stated I would be correct regardless of what color the sky actually is.


exGOPer said:
Fox News also cited Wheeler - who admitted he was lying, why the fuck would anyone believe rest of the story.

Simple question - if the Federal sources part was correct, why did Fox nuke that part from their site too?

How do you know it was a fact when they won't even stand for it.

No answer for that, keep spinning
More...
 
Last edited:
jem said:
that is the exact binary stupidity I am talking about.
you could not be waggie. you could be the same person who writes as tony stark becuase this is remarkably similar to his polling arguments.



If I said fox news said Obama stated the sky was red.
And you said he never stated it because the sky is actually blue.
Then I showed you the fox news story in which it says obama says the sky is red.

you would be wrong and
Obama would have been wrong or Fox news would have been wrong.
its possible you all are wrong...

But by virtue of the fact I produced an article stating what I said fox news stated I would be correct regardless of what color the sky actually is.
More...


You cannot cite A PART OF a story when the ENTIRETY OF THE STORY was REDACTED

Do you understand?

Fox News is NOT STANDING BY ANY of the story - so how can you keep blabbering about 'binary' when there is no unitary source for you to cite anymore.

Fox News says that they have a source that corroborates that the sky is purple and that water was dry, they redact BOTH the parts but you keep saying that 'sky is purple' part is right because I only showed you that 'water was dry' part was made up.

If sky was indeed purple then why didn't Fox stand by that part of the story? Because it was all a lie.

Glad to have educated a Con
 
ok tony


exGOPer said:
You cannot cite A PART OF a story when the ENTIRETY OF THE STORY was REDACTED

Do you understand?

Fox News is NOT STANDING BY ANY of the story - so how can you keep blabbering about 'binary' when there is no unitary source for you to cite anymore.

Fox News says that they have a source that corroborates that the sky is purple and that water was dry, they redact BOTH the parts but you keep saying that 'sky is purple' part is right because I only showed you that 'water was dry' part was made up.

If sky was indeed purple then why didn't Fox stand by that part of the story? Because it was all a lie.

Glad to have educated a Con
More...
 
jem said:
ok tony
More...

Did Kim Dotcom reveal I am Tony? Funny how you cons keep chanting 'No evidence' and then latch on to whatever preconceived notions you have when it suits you. Shameless hypocrites.
 
whatever troll...
you get proven to be an idiot by making claims you can't substantiate and then you act like I am the issue.

did fox news state at one point that they had spoken with a federal law enforcement officer?

if they did .. you are a drama boy asshole troll

=============
I have underlined statements which reporter's use when they identify the source of their info.

An FBI forensic report of Rich's computer -- generated within 96 hours after Rich's murder -- showed he made contact with WikiLeaks through Gavin MacFadyen, a now-deceased American investigative reporter, documentary filmmaker, and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time, the federal source told Fox News.

“I have seen and read the emails between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks,” the federal investigator told Fox News, confirming the MacFadyen connection. He said the emails are in possession of the FBI, while the stalled case is in the hands of the Washington Police Department.

(then the article says this is consistent with Wheeler...

then it says...)

The federal investigator, who requested anonymity, said 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments between Democratic National Committee leaders, spanning from January 2015 through late May 2016, were transferred from Rich to MacFadyen before May 21.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...contact-with-wikileaks-investigator-says.html

exGOPer said:
Did Kim Dotcom reveal I am Tony? Funny how you cons keep chanting 'No evidence' and then latch on to whatever preconceived notions you have when it suits you. Shameless hypocrites.
More...
 
SHARYL ATTKISSON: Pressure from Sponsors to Drop News Stories Like Seth Rich Is “Dangerous New Development” (Video)

Jim Hoft May 24th, 2017 2:46 pm 76 Comments

ATTKISSON: PRESSURE FROM SPONSORS TO DROP STORIES LIKE SETH RICH IS “DANGEROUS NEW DEVELOPMENT”
attkisson-media-575x288.jpg

Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson joined Steve Malzberg on Newsmax TV to discuss the liberal media, President Donald Trump’s first foreign trip and the Seth Rich murder investigation.

Attkisson told Steve she believes the Seth Rich family is being “managed” by outside interests and important questions still remain on the murder investigation.

Sharyl Attkisson: I think there are important questions and if you don’t know who murdered him you can’t really say, “Please don’t look here. That’s a conspiracy theory.” I feel for the family but I also think they are being managed. I would guess the article they wrote in the Washington Post, if I had to guess, I would say that letter was done with help… I think this case is being managed at various levels by people who don’t want this case investigated… That is sort of a dangerous new development in recent years, that there’s pressure to just stop covering a story entirely… There’s these narratives to try to stop a discussion and stop these investigations altogether rather than just provide a different viewpoint to it. That’s a scary development.

Via Newsmax TV:
 
jem said:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...e-brad-bauman-tied-media-matters-david-brock/
NOW: Spokesman in Seth Rich Case Brad Bauman Tied to Media Matters’ David Brock

Carter May 24th, 2017 4:31 pm 9 Comments

The acting spokesperson for the family of the late DNC staffer and suspected WikiLeaks source Seth Rich is a man named Brad Bauman who happens to be directly connected to Media Matters founder and George Soros-backed propagandist David Brock.
More...

It's almost like Seth Rich was a Democrat, his family is Democrat and are tied to another Democrats.

Someone investigate this BOMBSHELL.

Frickin morons.
 
jem said:
SHARYL ATTKISSON: Pressure from Sponsors to Drop News Stories Like Seth Rich Is “Dangerous New Development” (Video)

Jim Hoft May 24th, 2017 2:46 pm 76 Comments

ATTKISSON: PRESSURE FROM SPONSORS TO DROP STORIES LIKE SETH RICH IS “DANGEROUS NEW DEVELOPMENT”
attkisson-media-575x288.jpg

Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson joined Steve Malzberg on Newsmax TV to discuss the liberal media, President Donald Trump’s first foreign trip and the Seth Rich murder investigation.

Attkisson told Steve she believes the Seth Rich family is being “managed” by outside interests and important questions still remain on the murder investigation.

Sharyl Attkisson: I think there are important questions and if you don’t know who murdered him you can’t really say, “Please don’t look here. That’s a conspiracy theory.” I feel for the family but I also think they are being managed. I would guess the article they wrote in the Washington Post, if I had to guess, I would say that letter was done with help… I think this case is being managed at various levels by people who don’t want this case investigated… That is sort of a dangerous new development in recent years, that there’s pressure to just stop covering a story entirely… There’s these narratives to try to stop a discussion and stop these investigations altogether rather than just provide a different viewpoint to it. That’s a scary development.

Via Newsmax TV:
More...

There was no news, Fox News retracted the FAKE STORY.

And more bullshit from shill Attkisson, if you want to investigate then go ahead and do it, why the fck are you people making shit up and pretending it's news.

FAKE NEWS
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top