Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions

Tony Stark said:
Starr going after Clinton's sex life in an investigation over White Water is expanding an investigation far more than Mueller looking into Trumps finances and business dealings.
More...
Recommend that you research the Starr investigation and how the power was granted to him. It was more given to him than he wanted it. Please read up on it.
 
you lie your ass off.
who told you it was only personal emails...
the drives were bleached.
evidence was destroyed all over the place.

who pays you to tell such lies?

exGOPer said:
Typical double standard from disingenuous Cons.

Personal emails deleted were evidence of a crime someone was never accused of but looking for evidence of bribery and quid pro quo into someone's finances is a witch hunt.

With supporters like you, who needs a cult.
More...
 
jem said:
you lie your ass off.
who told you it was only personal emails...
the drives were bleached.
evidence was destroyed all over the place.

who pays you to tell such lies?
More...

Comey, the Republican investigator did. Also, Federal Records Act was updated AFTER Clinton left the department, prior to 2012, ALL government employees were allowed to determine federal records on their own, I can give you a citation if you want.

The emails were never considered evidence, they can be bleached or hammered, makes no difference. Stop repeating bullshit Donnie Moscow told you to repeat. Obviously no one pays you to tell such BS, its part of your cult training.
 
wow what lies you tell.
you have no idea if she destroyed solely private emails or not. related emails or not.
I would to see you give us a quote from anyone that can confirm that in light of the process or lawyer supposedly followed which did not include reading the emails ...

especially because after a year long investigation by the fbi found 17000 not turned over emails and many of them were work related.
 
jem said:
wow what lies you tell.
you have no idea if she destroyed solely private emails or not. related emails or not.
.
More...

Blah blah blah, you think there is some email committee going through emails of every federal employee? Whatever is sent to .gov address is supposed to be automatically captured, anything outside is an employee's discretion whether they were private or not. If Clinton wanted to hide emails, she could have easily used two email addresses (one .gov and one private) to keep things secret, she didn't need to go through the conspriacy charade you guys have cooked up.

Here's the law in case you are interested, because these are not from Breitbart or Gateway Pundit, you may consider them to be 'lies'


There is no question that former Secretary Clinton had authority to delete personal emails without agency supervision – she appropriately could have done so even if she were working on a government server. Under policies issue both by the National Archives and Records Administration (“NARA”) and the State Department, individual officers and employees are permitted and expected to exercise judgment to determine what constitutes a federal record. See NARA Bulletin 2014-06 ¶4 (Sept. 15, 2014) (“Currently, in many agencies, employees manage their own email accounts and apply their own understanding of Federal records management. This means that all employees are required to review each message, identify its value, and either delete it or move it to a recordkeeping system.”);3 Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual, 5 FAM 443.2(b) (“[t]he intention of this guidance is not to require the preservation of every E-mail message.”)
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2401598/state-objections.pdf
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top