LOL. Sure thing buddy. If they had anything, anything at all, this would already be in court. The person who put the biggest hurt on Hillary was Hillary herself. Deny it all you like. It's amusing to watch you lefties spin like a top while Trump changes the world.
Mueller admits: Can’t Indict a Sitting President
- Thread starter bone
- Start date
I see. New laws being invented right as we speak.
The house committee directly communicated an order to her to preserve ALL emails. She could have challenged that in court if she wanted but not destroy evidence first and then challenge it, and yes, if she probably could have gotten away with it based on her ability to delete private emails if she had done it before receiving an order to preserve evidence.
Sorry Cowboy. Basic stuff here. Let me know what Mueller would have done if he subpoened some Trump evidence and it was destroyed a few days later.
Last edited:
It is bullshit - I wanted Bernie Sanders to win his campaign fair and square but he did not.
Didn't Hillary and the DNC run automated social media bot accounts ? As I recall, they had multiple consulting firms doing it for them as well.
Ask yourself - if Clinton had bothered campaigning in Wisconsin, Ohio, and Pennsylvania (instead of in the States where she really didn't need the votes - safely Democratic) in the month prior to the election would Trump be President ? I say very doubtful.
You live by the sword, you die by the sword.
Hillary only got as far along as she did because Comey and McCabe covered for her and did a sham investigation. So she is indebted to them to have gotten far enough along to even be the nominee.
But Comey got caught in a bind and his own corrupt organization inadvertently cornered him. He had promised the House Committee that he would report any new findings on Hillary even though he was letting her off. Then he found out that McCabe had been sitting on those emails that huma and the weiner had and had not even looked at them. McCabe had them for a month and still had not looked at them, but they had been sent to McCabe by the Southern District office that was doing the investigation of the pervert. So now Comey was in a bind. He had promised one thing to the Committee but his deputy mccabe had been hiding shit.
Sorry if the swamp house-of-cards plan collapsed and their various little schemes got all tangled up.
I will let the IG say more on that.
Just don't y'all forget what is going on here in this thread.
The thread is about Mueller not being able to indict a president or disagreements with that.
We are now well into discussing Hillary stuff that has been discussed a thousand times.
Good job tards- except it is not working with me. I see your gig.
The thread is about Mueller not being able to indict a president or disagreements with that.
We are now well into discussing Hillary stuff that has been discussed a thousand times.
Good job tards- except it is not working with me. I see your gig.
The DNC helped her out a great deal (understatement of the year) with her primary opponent but that's water under the dam.
There’s not much to say about this other than it is not settled law.
Whether you believe Giuliani is your business. I give it 50/50 as a true statement.
We can always go back to the question you ignored, what would Mueller indict Trump for?
Comey was one front and Russia was another. Trump did not win a free and fair election.
Ironically, Clinton had to fund her primary opponent along with the dnc, all while having to beat him.
If it wasn’t for closed door caucuses Bernie wouldn’t have even had a chance.