Sorry, all I got out of that was another whine, and irregular grammar.
Megyn Kelly to depart Fox News for NBC
- Thread starter Clubber Lang
- Start date
Sorry, all I got out of that was another whine, and irregular grammar.
...whatever your imagination and wishful thinking concocted.
You are correct. There is concrete evidence Obama meddled in GB politics and 'failed'.
Get help, Freddie. I'm sure a good therapist can help with all your rage and despair. Perhaps, for a few more $$ you can even get them to help you with your superiority complex. Folks might want to invite you to parties again.
Right. Whereas you're the one who finds himself in perpetual agreement in P&R with this guy:
Speaks volumes.
Ah, so because we have the same political view, that means I endorse his comment regarding how often you toss your mom's salad, is that it?
So, by the same tone, you find yourself in agreement with Futurecurrents all the time, does that mean you support all of his comments:
Speaks volumes, right?
Not some of FT's finer moments. We've all had them. But when you unnecessarily weave family members into particularly vile insults, it reaches a whole different level. During a typically "warm" exchange, Tommy Boy unnecessarily equated my mother's face with a horse's ass. Where did that come from? Who does that? I don't care when he insults me, but Tom has gone full juvenile. I responded with a joke and a Family Guy video. Sure, it was insulting, but only fitting given the unnecessary turn taken by your bro. And then the salad thing.
Are you responsible for what Tom B. writes? Of course not. But you're P&R soul mates. Just wanted you to get a glimpse of the caliber of your peer group. See, that's the thing. You guys are not even cognizant of the various lines you're crossing, be it unacceptable insults or political "thinking." It is in your nature.
Soul mates, are we?
Lots of posters on this forum - on both sides of the aisle - have said things I would not endorse or that I have found unacceptable. That's between them and the person they are "talking" with. But you've now brought me in on this, and implied, not only that I can't read his comments for myself, but that I'm somehow guilty by association.
The fact that he and I agree on political talking points doesn't make us peers.
Wait. You mean like someone else's e-mails reflect on Clinton's character? You mean like that?
See, now is a perfect time for your "False Equivalence" argument/link. Tom is not the manager of my Presidential campaign, nor am I running one. He has never worked for me, done business with me, or endorsed me for office. He and I have no affiliation whatsoever.
That was a hell of a leap you just made in your desperation.