But you find yourselves on the same side of every P&R argument. Every single one. You two could write each other's posts and no one would know the difference. Two peas in a pod, birds of a feather and so on. The same level of "maturity" in your thought process. You two have so much to talk about...
Megyn Kelly to depart Fox News for NBC
- Thread starter Clubber Lang
- Start date
Now you're just making even more desperate assumptions/hyperbole. Please show me the post that asks members of this forum their position on every single political view. Whatever else you are, I at least thought you were intelligent. The fact that you see Tom and I having similar political views on a particular thread just means we've both commented on that thread and we have the same view on it - that's all. How many other threads have I not commented on because I didn't agree with the premise, or I didn't want to get into a discussion on? How many has he? You simply don't know.
It's like your Russian accusation of hacking. You want to believe, because it's convenient to your narrative. But you have no proof whatsoever.
But even if we did have exactly the same viewpoint on politics. It still has no more bearing on our familiarity than two random people in different parts of the world who both agree that the sky is blue, or that vanilla ice cream is the most delicious.
And if Tom wrote my posts here (or vice versa), I believe there would be a good deal of folks who would know the difference. That's just more of your horseshit.
Don't sell yourself short. I'm sure you're just as smart as Tom B. And not only do you share every political view and "news" story slant with him, but you also have a tendency to add sex into one of your little "debates" when it is not going your way. You referred to futurecurrents earlier. Why do you think he might write some of those things that he writes? Could it be that your bros have relentlessly attacked him similarly when he didn't fall in line with the Right's jackboot thinking? You need look no further than your own doorstep:
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/search/6105955/?q=futurecurrents+brother&o=date&c[user][0]=137314
See? You're just like Tom B. Interchangeable.
[QUOTE="Frederick Foresight, post: 4385565, member: 488296" You referred to futurecurrents earlier. Why do you think he might write some of those things that he writes? Could it be that your bros have relentlessly attacked him similarly when he didn't fall in line with the Right's jackboot thinking? [/QUOTE]
Doesn't your kind ever get tired of always blaming someone else for your retarded behavior? Holy crap, grow up and take responsibility for your own actions.
Doesn't your kind ever get tired of always blaming someone else for your retarded behavior? Holy crap, grow up and take responsibility for your own actions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reading_comprehensionDoesn't your kind ever get tired of always blaming someone else for your retarded behavior? Holy crap, grow up and take responsibility for your own actions.
Thunderpussy, no one is responsible for my comments except me. You are trying to link Tsing Tao with me because you lost a debate against him again. You started our interaction on this thread with an unprovoked ad hominem attack on me, which is your usual MO. Usually I just move on after a couple of posts because you have to have the last word, and I don't have the time. This time I did not, and now you are whinning like an insecure, pathetic Canadian. Either put me on ignore, or don't start with a personal attack.
Ah, so now it's "all my bros". Can you provide me a list of all the people whose comments I am responsible for? Just for posterity.
Are you on medication?
Or is it just a reading comprehension thing.
If someone needs medication, it is you, and I would suggest an anti psychotic to help with your schizophrenia. If you aren't holding me accountable or associating me with the commentary of "all my bros" then why the hell are you bringing it up over and over?
I responded to your ad hominem response to another poster, you insipid juvenile:
You didn't even comprehend what you were responding to, but you had to lead with an insult. That's the usual result of being both smug and stupid.