What you state is quite questionable. See for example my post #60 where I quote numbers from Veterans Affairs for essentially equivalent populations of veterans. The veterans with mean age 69 who caught either influenza or Covid were 3.5 times more likely to die from Covid than from influenza. (See also my "errata" post which followed post #60) It would be better, I would think, if you want to characterize Covid as the flu, to call it a particularly pernicious form of flu. Certainly the range of symptoms, pathology and histology for Covid is significantly different than for what we are used to finding in influenza patients.192K and change cases we know of. We also know that nearly 50% of Covid infected have no symptoms or symptoms so mild one might not know they are sick. Double your number of cases and then tell us the case fatality rate. We also know that dying from Covid and dying with Covid are two completely different things though all are lumped together. Easily cut the death rate in half to get those that actually died from Covid. Actual case fatality rate is probably less than one percent, and then we can throw out the 80 percent who were on their death beds to begin with. Now we're down to a bad flu season which is where the true number has been all along.
Happy to have cleared this up for you
I don't care so much what you call it as I care about what it has done to us. Before we had widely available monoclonal antibodies and a vaccine this thing we call Covid, or a very bad flu, was killing people at an alarming rate.
Last edited: