I can understand that, but he could have help instruct. The vast, VAST majority of cops don’t start their shifts with the intent of hurting people.
Like most everything if you give a little respect you’ll receive a little respect.
MAGAtards at it again
- Thread starter Cuddles
- Start date
I can understand that, but he could have help instruct. The vast, VAST majority of cops don’t start their shifts with the intent of hurting people.
Like most everything if you give a little respect you’ll receive a little respect.
Let's be honest, the pig didn't buy the "I can't comply because I'm not a miracle worker" argument of the suspect and instead of looking for a wheelchair in the car or asking for one on the radio, decided to drag his ass out.
Alas, I've seen worse use of taxpayer dollars than a wheelchair bound guy getting his pay day and proper healthcare as a result.
At a traffic stop if an officer asks you to exit your vehicle I’m pretty sure thats a lawful order.
Ah well, they charged him for tints in the tried and true US police approach of do something wrong so charge everything you can think of instead of apologising. That may have it hard to see into the back but not relevant for the front seat.
To an extent I'm sympathetic up to a point but the cop was excessive.
Always fascinating to see the cons doing authoritarian state can't tell me what do except with cops when I will completely subjugate myself because those fuckers are killers.
Last edited:
And they could have called the fire department/ambulance. You know, healthcare folks.
The intent of cops at the start of their shifts are irrelevant. Here's what you basically just said: "The first-time criminal never intended to kill the clerk after robbing the store when he woke that morning."
If you put out good vibrations ... yada yada. Relevance?
Cops don't get to add requirements upon citizens outside of the law/constitution. If the law allows one to be disrespectful, so be it. Either change the law, or sensitive, angry cops need to find a new profession.
What if someone is mentally ill? Incapacitated? Trapped? Disabled? Etc.
There are exceptions that are likely addressed in the police manuals.
Obviously, 'impossibility' to follow an order safely is a defense. It is up to the trained professional to know what s/he is doing; to know what the proper procedure is; and to follow it.
likely counts as unlawful detainment w/o cause at that point:
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/magatards-at-it-again.360541/page-4#post-5469335
Michael Hetle, 54, shot Maryland National Guardsman Javon Prather, 24, in Springfield, Virginia - a suburb of Washington DC, in March 2020.
He then pointed the gun at Prather's wife as she rushed to save him and shouted: 'You want it to?
He tried to argue that he fired the shots in self-defense to protect his family claiming that Prather threated him for months before the the deadly encounter.
But the jury did not believe Hetle's defense after video footage of the violent attack was shown as evidence.
On March 4, 2020, Hetle fired seven shots in six seconds, murdering his neighbor with whom he shares a wall as nearby residents and the victim's wife watched in shock.
Hetle is recorded firing four shots at point-blank range, two shots in Prather's back as he runs away and falls down the front steps, and then the final shot as Prather lays in Hetle's driveway.
Prather's wife Janelle is then seen rushing over to her husband as Hetle aims his gun at her threatening: 'You want it to?'
Fairfax County prosecutor Lyle Burnham referred to the shooting as an execution during his closing statement.
He said: 'He didn't want Javon hurt. He didn't want Javon to leave. He wanted Javon dead.'
Prather's wife insist that the conflict between Hetle, a white man, and Prather, a bi-racial man, was racially motivated as testimony revealed that Hetle often referred to his neighbor using a racial slur.
He previously worked for the Bellevue Police Department, until his resignation in 2003, and had been involved in two fatal in-the-line-of-duty shootings.
In 2001, he shot dead an unarmed Latino man during a domestic violence call, and in 2000 he shot and killed an armed bank robbery suspect, the Washington Post reported.
Hetle was cleared of any criminal wrongdoing in both cases, but the family of the unarmed Latino man filed a civil suit against him and the city. The family later settled the suit for $75,000.
He then pointed the gun at Prather's wife as she rushed to save him and shouted: 'You want it to?
He tried to argue that he fired the shots in self-defense to protect his family claiming that Prather threated him for months before the the deadly encounter.
But the jury did not believe Hetle's defense after video footage of the violent attack was shown as evidence.
On March 4, 2020, Hetle fired seven shots in six seconds, murdering his neighbor with whom he shares a wall as nearby residents and the victim's wife watched in shock.
Hetle is recorded firing four shots at point-blank range, two shots in Prather's back as he runs away and falls down the front steps, and then the final shot as Prather lays in Hetle's driveway.
Prather's wife Janelle is then seen rushing over to her husband as Hetle aims his gun at her threatening: 'You want it to?'
Fairfax County prosecutor Lyle Burnham referred to the shooting as an execution during his closing statement.
He said: 'He didn't want Javon hurt. He didn't want Javon to leave. He wanted Javon dead.'
Prather's wife insist that the conflict between Hetle, a white man, and Prather, a bi-racial man, was racially motivated as testimony revealed that Hetle often referred to his neighbor using a racial slur.
He previously worked for the Bellevue Police Department, until his resignation in 2003, and had been involved in two fatal in-the-line-of-duty shootings.
In 2001, he shot dead an unarmed Latino man during a domestic violence call, and in 2000 he shot and killed an armed bank robbery suspect, the Washington Post reported.
Hetle was cleared of any criminal wrongdoing in both cases, but the family of the unarmed Latino man filed a civil suit against him and the city. The family later settled the suit for $75,000.