MAGAtard lies and sics 911 on black man working his route

You do not know this as fact as only Zimmerman and Martin knows what happened when they first came face to face after Martin was being chased by Zimmerman.We do know you think a white person had the right to shoot Zimmerman in that situation.If its a black person you believe and support Zimmerman though.

All the 911 calls and physical evidence fully supports Zimmerman's version of events without exception.
 
I'm sure the same was said when Emmett Till was lynched

So you are trying to stretch this situation to somehow be equivalent to Emmett Till --- well it is not and your suggesting it does simply undermines an assertions you make on the subject.
 
It also comes down to -- "did you lie about the situation like this Sheriff did"? If you lie about a situation on a 911 call then that evidence will be used against you possibly in a court. If the information you provided to an 911 operator is honest & correct then no jury will even consider convicting you for following someone suspicious in your own neighborhood. Of course, I am making the assumption that you do not initiate a confrontation with the person by assaulting them and do not start a verbal altercation with the person.

George Zimmerman did not assault Trayvon Martin, nor did Zimmerman confront him verbally. Martin violently assaulting Zimmerman -- leading to Zimmerman pulling his legally concealed pistol and killing Martin. Fully justified as determined by a jury.
Again, you're attempting to move the goal post. My response was specific to something specific you said. I did not respond regarding any of the examples you cite above.

@gwb-trading "If the information you provided to an 911 operator is honest & correct then no jury will even consider convicting you for following someone suspicious in your own neighborhood."

I never said anything whatsoever about convictions.

I spoke towards the illegality of something you claimed to be legal in your area. Period, point blank.

But to respond simply anyway: Did OJ, not being convicted of murder, mean murder is legal.

That's how your mind continually twists and conflates stuff. Going forward, try to stay focused, and stop

BreakableDeliciousCapybara-size_restricted.gif
 
So you are trying to stretch this situation to somehow be equivalent to Emmett Till --- well it is not and your suggesting it does simply undermines an assertions you make on the subject.
The situation where law enforcement lies about black crimes all the time? Were you in a comma these last 3 yrs?
 
All the 911 calls and physical evidence fully supports Zimmerman's version of events without exception.


When it was Zimmerman chasing Martin who was trying to get away it does not.And the 911 call shows Zimmerman was told to stop chasing Martin.
 
Again, you're attempting to move the goal post. My response was specific to something specific you said. I did not respond regarding any of the examples you cite above.

@gwb-trading "If the information you provided to an 911 operator is honest & correct then no jury will even consider convicting you for following someone suspicious in your own neighborhood."

I never said anything whatsoever about convictions.

I spoke towards the illegality of something you claimed to be legal in your area. Period, point blank.

But to respond simply anyway: Did OJ, not being convicted of murder, mean murder is legal.

That's how your mind continually twists and conflates stuff. Going forward, try to stay focused, and stop

BreakableDeliciousCapybara-size_restricted.gif

"I never said anything whatsoever about convictions."


Say's the guy who previously said:

"They hope to find jurors like you."

Yeah.. we all know who is attempting to move the goalposts here.
 
BTW,still waiting for sources for the bull shit you made up

There are entire threads dealing with the information and evidence from this case. Go back and read them if you wish to educate yourself.

It is not worth the time & effort to go through the entire "Zimmerman thread" again attempting to "re-litigate" the Zimmerman situation. Clearly you are stuck on your opinion and the justice system is stuck on reality -- as shown by the verdict.
 
There are entire threads dealing with the information and evidence from this case. Go back and read them if you wish to educate yourself.

It is not worth the time & effort to go through the entire "Zimmerman thread" again attempting to "re-litigate" the Zimmerman situation. Clearly you are stuck on your opinion and the justice system is stuck on reality -- as shown by the verdict.

No,the stalking requires previous contact and the case of the burglars in your neighborhood being caught by the citizen who chased them in his car and on foot.
 
Back
Top