"Get smart"!? You can't fix stupid.
Justice department ruled Trump unfit, sought to invoke the 25th
- Thread starter Cuddles
- Start date
Camp Trump is its own party. Any suggestion that some nominal, marginal type republicans are somehow inclined to be favorable toward Trump is either absurd or not to be taken as a given.
Trump went to DC on a platform of going after dc swampsters and lots of butt-hurt republicans knew that they would be in the crosshairs and were better off staying close to hillary because they had already been in the Obama administration, so knew that they would are already safe under a dem administration. Under Trump after you have tried to overthrow the presidency? - not so much.
First of all you’re completely wrong. Donald Trump is completely corrupt and highly suspicious. He should be and is rightly under investigation for many things, including conspiracy to defraud the American people, obstruction of justice, illegal campaign finance contributions, whatever the hell happened with the inaugural committee and who knows what’s going on with Saudi Arabia and nuclear technology.
Trump is a threat to the status quo because we have never seen a criminal of this magnitude at this level of power.
All of this stuff about a political elite and fraternity does not excuse the level disgrace and corruption from Trump.
Trump never went to dc to drain any swamp. He showed up and found out there is functioning criminal investigation and oversight. All the moves he has made has been in an effort to protect himself and all of his illegal activities.
Pinning this as trump v the swamp is a fucking joke. Trump is a criminal, full stop.
What actions have Dems taken to try to remove Trump?
Not saying they started impeachment or anything, but the investigations are cranking up in the house and the answers are already known, yes he's corrupt AF. Doesn't matter, the hard core won't believe it, the rest already know it. Give the people a moderate alternative and the nightmare is over.
I for one welcome the charges piling up on Trump the citizen
During the Civil War Admiral Farragut was leading the Union naval forces at the battle of Mobile Bay. During the battle one of the ships said something to the effect of we can’t go forward there’s torpedoes. Back in those days mines in the water were called torpedoes. Did Farragut say, ok let’s go home and hope for a political victory?
No! He said damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.
And that’s what I say to this idea that congress should back down from its constitutional mandate because the waters are dangerous. Damn the torpedoes.
It seems to me when you say things like someone is completely wrong and someone else completely corrupt, you have an obligation to back up with what you say with current, specific, and revelant examples.
There is some evidence that you are a foreigner talking about US politics on a US based blog.
If that is true, a reasonable question would be: Why? I don’t go to a Russian based blog and complain about Putin, for example.
Now back to Trump. What is your case against him? Please skip what he may have done before he was President. No one really needs to hear about the time he was six and threw sand in someones eye, etc.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...bi_coup_against_trump_want_special_prosecutor
Most See Crime in Justice, FBI ‘Coup’ Against Trump, Want Special Prosecutor
Fifty-six percent (56%) of Likely U.S. Voters believe senior federal law enforcement officials are likely to have broken the law in their discussions in May 2017 to oust Trump, with 37% who say it is Very Likely. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 36% consider that unlikely, with 19% who say it’s Not At All Likely that they broke the law. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
Fifty-one percent (51%) think a special prosecutor should be named to investigate the discussions among senior Justice Department and FBI officials in May 2017 to remove the president from office. Thirty-eight percent (38%) disagree, but 11% are undecided.
Most See Crime in Justice, FBI ‘Coup’ Against Trump, Want Special Prosecutor
Fifty-six percent (56%) of Likely U.S. Voters believe senior federal law enforcement officials are likely to have broken the law in their discussions in May 2017 to oust Trump, with 37% who say it is Very Likely. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 36% consider that unlikely, with 19% who say it’s Not At All Likely that they broke the law. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
Fifty-one percent (51%) think a special prosecutor should be named to investigate the discussions among senior Justice Department and FBI officials in May 2017 to remove the president from office. Thirty-eight percent (38%) disagree, but 11% are undecided.