Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

[RedDuke]

Quote from Lucrum:

1) so far as I know no one is even advocating private ownership of bazookas
Although I wouldn't personally be opposed to it.

...

If bazookas would be allowed, you do realize that there will be civilian planes shot down by psychos.

That's why I am making a point that certain weapons should not be in hands of civilians, even though 2nd amendment gives us the right to bear them.

 

[RedDuke]

Quote from Trader666:

I've given an intelligent argument. The Second Amendment and its intent. ...

I have given you an intelligent argument why 2nd Amendment allows me to own a bazooka, yet it is not allowed under laws of our land.

How is it different if AR15 will no longer be allowed?

Both infringe of my 2nd Amendment right.

 

[Trader666]

ROFL!!!!! This from the ignoranus who's never served and has never actually secured a town. You have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA what you're talking about. An ant knows more about nuclear physics than you do about this and yet you continue to spew your asinine, uninformed opinions based on God only knows what. Did your mother drop you on your head when you were a baby? You need professional help. Opinions are one thing but you don't even have a clue about what you don't know. That's creepy.

Quote from RedDuke:

No I have not. One way a town can be secured is by airstrikes destroying about 10-20% of it, the rest will be given a chance of either surrender or death. Most will surrender.

Just because the wars are not run this way due to humanitarian reasons, does not mean they can not. The fact is AR15 will not help. The minimal required weapon for effective protection will be modern cannons, self guided rockets and grenades with launchers, and lots of them.

I also doubt that our military will turn against us.

 

[RedDuke]

Quote from BSAM:

Be careful about making 'em mad, brother Duke.
(Raising eyebrows and speaking with fake scared voice...): They'll put you on ignore.:eek:

Some might have their temper raising, but that's because they are running out of arguments to defend their position. Or take it persoanlly when someone challanges their staus quo.

CT tragedy was a wake up call to many. CT law makers biting themselves right now for being cowards and not standing up to gun lobbyists:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...st-nerve-on-ban-when-gun-lobby-mobilized.html

Quote from the article:

Republican Representative Arthur O’Neill said he was “dubious” about the bill last year and now believes it “certainly deserves another hearing.”
“If we had passed that piece of legislation and we hadn’t had a 30-round magazine, then exactly what happened in Newtown could not have happened,” O’Neill said. “It might have led to a lower death toll.

 

[RedDuke]

Quote from Trader666:

ROFL!!!!! This from the ignoranus who's never served and has never actually secured a town. You have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA what you're talking about. An ant knows more about nuclear physics than you do about this and yet you continue to spew your asinine, uninformed opinions based on God only knows what. Did your mother drop you on your head when you were a baby? You need professional help. Opinions are one thing but you don't even have a clue about what you don't know. That's creepy.

I am done responding to your posts. When people like you have no real arguments to advocate their position all they can do are insults.

If you ever were under gun fire, you would them know who scary it is. Bombs are the whole other level. I just greatly simplified how a town can be secured, so that someone of your level of intelligence can understand. Guess even that was too much for your brain to process.

 

[Trader666]

You do realize that planes can be shot down with rifles, don't you? Again you display your ignorance.

Quote from RedDuke:

If bazookas would be allowed, you do realize that there will be civilian planes shot down by psychos.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from RedDuke:

It does happen, thought rarely....

They why are you trying to use it to justify a semi auto rifle ban then?

As I have shown to you by your 0.7 examples, studies are often biased and do not show real picture, especially on the subject of guns.

Which of course works BOTH ways. But then I assume you knew that already.

We do not even really know how many firearms we have in our country.

So? We don't know how much cocaine we have either and it's not even legal.

My preferred allowed hunting rifle would be side by side. We both know this will not pass ever.

I did most of my white tail hunting with a Springfield Armory M1A. Their semi auto only version of the M14 main battle rifle. Admittedly I harvested half a dozen with a single shot. Nor did I ever top off the 20 round mag.

 

[RedDuke]

Quote from Trader666:

You do realize that planes can be shot down with rifles, don't you? Again you display your ignorance.

Sorry, this is definitely my last response to you. I just almost fell of my chair when I saw it.

Speaking of ignorance. WOW!!!

Let me break news to you sport, yes planes from WW1 and some from early days of WW2 could be. I bet anyone who will read this, will think that it is the funniest post of a day or a week.

Bringing down a modern day plane with a rifle shot

Dude, you intelligence level is quite obvious now without any reasonable doubt.

 

[Trader666]

As I said, you don't even know what you don't know. And this proves it in spades

Quote from RedDuke:

If you ever were under gun fire, you would them know who scary it is. Bombs are the whole other level. I just greatly simplified how a town can be secured, so that someone of your level of intelligence can understand. Guess even that was too much for your brain to process.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from RedDuke:

If bazookas would be allowed, you do realize that there will be civilian planes shot down by psychos.

Not likely, bazookas are a WWII weapon no longer in production and wholly unsuited to targeting aircraft. Do you mean RPG's and shoulder fired anti aircraft weapons?

That's why I am making a point that certain weapons should not be in hands of civilians, even though 2nd amendment gives us the right to bear them.

Bans on ANY weapon has never and will NEVER keep it out the hands of those that really want it.

You familiar with the 21st amendment to the constitution?
In your opinion how is our "war on drugs" and those substances being banned working out?