Sorry, I cannot comment on other peoples habits, but I can say that from an observers perspective, constructive criticisms and/or arguments as to the merits or lack thereof of the prescribed techniques may be a more effective and substantive approach. I believe this was the purpose of the OP (though I may be mistaken).Quote from MandelbrotSet:
First off, thank you for your intelligent, on-topic response to the thread.
But you're worng in terms of how and why these threads start.
Jack Hershey makes it a habit of going around to other peoples threads, butting his nose in their business, and then starts in with the fantatiscal claims (none of which I believe - despite your statements to contrary - in the least, for reasons which I will not divulge here) of extraordinary profitability.
Unlike your ultra-sophisticated SCT Methodology, it's really as simple as that.
Firstly, I envy you C-kid... Not everyone comes out of the womb as a slick and successful trader - Bravo to you, you smell terrific... I will say this much, being new, I feel it is important for an individual to be able to distinguish between effective and efficient learning vs a path which yields little. This can be measured by results.
Secondly, what was offerred was not advise, it was opinion, as requested by the OP. Class, here is yet another example of "translation". Should you choose to partake in the JHM journey, DO NOT end up as a poster child on the warning label of the journals...
Have a great night folks.
