"Words" in statutes... that is what laws are made of in in the United States. The words have to be there because the Constitution voids laws which are bills of attainder or ex post facto.
Its funny that you would have a problem with reviewing the words in a criminal statute to see if the statue applies to American politicians or foreign contributors.
2. Trump Jr would be subject to a different analysis, which I am not making.
3. So unless you can show that Trump Senior solicited or accepted b through d of your statue you have not shown him to have been in violation of any law so far.
Its funny that you would have a problem with reviewing the words in a criminal statute to see if the statue applies to American politicians or foreign contributors.
2. Trump Jr would be subject to a different analysis, which I am not making.
3. So unless you can show that Trump Senior solicited or accepted b through d of your statue you have not shown him to have been in violation of any law so far.
And who would you believe, an election law expert with books and papers on the subject or some dumbass newly registered troll who looks for 'words' in statutes, doesn't understand who the law applies to and engages in 'whatabout hillary' with every post
Donald Trump Jr. Emails Paint Serious Case of Campaign Finance Violations
https://electionlawblog.org/?p=93740
Richard L. Hasen is an American legal scholar and expert in legislation, election law and campaign finance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_L._Hasen
Last edited: