yesIt does not matter if the market is random
that was what i was trying to say.
you understood it because you are a trader not a scientist
yesIt does not matter if the market is random
How many mathematical mistakes can be packed into one paragraph? WOW. I guess that your contention explains why there are so few mathematicians in finance. (And engineers, and physicists, and...)They're all just mistaken, and wasting their lives.
Poor schmucks.
But a sobering thought: the best single predictor of a price today, is the price yesterday. Randomize that!
Professor Tom,But a sobering thought: the best single predictor of a price today, is the price yesterday. Randomize that!
just because you cannot determine it, does not mean it is random........How do I determine from yesterday's price what today's price will be, up or down from yesterday?
reminds me of LTCM and the two nobel laureutsI guess that your contention explains why there are so few mathematicians in finance. (And engineers, and physicists, and...)
padutrader,yes
that was what i was trying to say.
you understood it because you are a trader not a scientist
The point myself and others are making is that markets switch regimes, often violently, between random and nonrandom. Saying that autocorrelation is the best market model is wrong. However, that doesn't mean you can't money under the autocorrelation assumption, you just have to use it in the context of a trading system and then properly backtest.How many mathematical mistakes can be packed into one paragraph? WOW. I guess that your contention explains why there are so few mathematicians in finance. (And engineers, and physicists, and...)They're all just mistaken, and wasting their lives.
Poor schmucks.
But a sobering thought: the best single predictor of a price today, is the price yesterday. Randomize that!
good advicethrow this market random stuff away and get back to the charts everyone