Is Bush really the worst President ever - Economically the answer is YES

Bush is the worst

  • Yes

    Votes: 117 57.4%
  • No

    Votes: 44 21.6%
  • I gave up caring

    Votes: 43 21.1%

  • Total voters
    204
Quote from gnome:

I'm not going to do a Ben Franklin close on this, but let me address 2 points...

1. Bush claimed Iraq had WMDs... The UN was sent in to inspect. Couldn't find any. Iraq claimed they didn't have them. Bush invaded anyway. It was his PERSONAL agenda at great expense to the tax payer (all those debts and deficits will eventually be accounted for, you know) and the loss of 4,000 lives and 30,000 wounded. And now, he won't leave and is "staying the course" simply to "save face"... again at great cost to us. His actions are UNCONSCIONABLE.

2. Nixon initiated wage and price controls when inflation reached 4%.... Well, we've got inflation at 3 TIMES that NOW... and what we get is MORE MONEY-PUMP inflation and LIES about it... That's much worse in my mind.

And yes, I voted Bush as the worst. Of course I would... I'm an Andrew Jackson man.
I agree.
Quote from gnome:

Ehhhh.... Your statement strikes me to be about as logical as claiming Bill Clinton was good economically because he raised taxes.

Carter inherited a bunch of his mess... and he couldn't do anything about OPEC or the Ayatolla.

We can't honestly claim Bill Clinton as "great" or even "good" just because he was EXTRAORDINARILY lucky and raised taxes.

But Bush has been BLATANTLY horrid.. he made his own mess and is sticking to it.
I agree.

Quote from gnome:

...The best America can hope for is a McCain victory...
I think he's a nice guy, but I disagree.
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

I am genuinely amazed at how some people here willingly, if perhaps not knowingly, embarrass themselves to no end by supporting anything that GWB has ever done. And that these folks are not even remotely embarrassed by their president and his conduct gives me pause. True, we must all allow for a difference of opinion. But reality can only accommodate so much. The Internet is well and truly an eye-opener.

What do you have against George Wrong Bush.
And dont blame me, I wasnt even at his christening.
 
Quote from jficquette:

Its no wonder that people who are so wrong about Bush tend to be so wrong about the Market.
John

Well spotted John, but he is still the only player who I would fade again and again.

All the others lose through inconsistency, but not Jorge.
 
Again, no facts.....

Only delusional rantings of liberal zealots....

Everyone, and I mean everyone, all national intelligence agencies said WMD were in Iraq......Clinton, Gore, Kerry etc etc etc


Yet, only Bush lied....

Take the other side of the arguement.....Bush doesn't do anything....Saddam drops something on Isreal....15,000 killed...

What would you looneys be saying then....Bush KNEW Iraq had WMD!!!! Everyone KNEW it.....

Bush proposed a Soc Sec revamp....Dems/press went ballistic...did you ever hear a counter proposal from Dems?

I haven't heard much on SS since then....Dems don't have any idea how to solve problem....

FACTS on war....again flip it around....Churchill wanted to take out Hitler in 30's.....called a warmonger.....no action....50 million died in WWII....

You guys are just totally clueless......and yet you cannot understand why US keepig electing Republicans to office...and by the way, Bill Clinton, was a liberal Republican, more than a liberal Dem.

SteveD
 
Quote from SteveD:

Again, no facts.....

Only delusional rantings of liberal zealots....

Everyone, and I mean everyone, all national intelligence agencies said WMD were in Iraq......Clinton, Gore, Kerry etc etc etc


Yet, only Bush lied....


rubbish from a redneck above - get wise

The UN team that visited Iraq again and again to look for WMD definately said that there were NO WMD in Iraq before the war.

It was just Junior doing what his Daddy hadn't done before. At 3 trillion dollars and counting - expensive
 
Quote from Humpy:

"... It was just Junior doing what his Daddy hadn't done before. At 3 trillion dollars and counting - expensive

Let's not forget 4,000 dead and 30,000 wounded, too.
 
Quote from gnome:

Let's not forget 4,000 dead and 30,000 wounded, too.


That is odd gnome, I thought the Iraqi numbers were higher than that.

And shouldnt you be counting the Brit, Aussie, Kiwi, Japan, Pole etc etc figures.

Dead is dead and wounded is wounded.

Oh and dont forget to include the US figures as well.
 
Back
Top