Bush promoted his PERSONAL agenda at the expense of the American public and the lives of American service people. And he "charged it" to the tune of nearly DOUBLING the national debt during his term. (Imagine.. what took America 200 years to build up as national debt, Bush nearly doubled in 8 years.)
UNCONSCIONABLE GREED AND HUBRIS!!
(And please don't come back with "Yeah, but Clinton was great".... he was a potlicker, too.)
My feeling is anyone who becomes president will have there own agenda so you just hope they try to improve America in the process. I didnât think Clinton was amazing but I would take him over George Bush any day.
My feeling is anyone who becomes president will have there own agenda so you just hope they try to improve America in the process. I didnât think Clinton was amazing but I would take him over George Bush any day.
Theoretically, Presidents are supposed to "lead the country in its best interest"... NOT PROMOTE A PERSONAL AGENDA at the country's expense.
We didn't elect Bush [nor anyone else] with the the idea that he would have carte blanche with the people's assets to do anything he damned well pleased.
I donât believe in the process either. The person who would make a great president would never be seen in the primary system. I agree with a lot of your comments except for flat tax or no federal income tax for the most part.
Best 2 Presidents in the last 100 years:
1-Reagan
2-GW Bush (current president)
..thankful Gore did not win in 2000 or imagine him leading USA after 9-11...he would have wanted to 'dialogue' with Taliban...never forget this defining moment..here's to GW Bush!!!any economic problems were 'seeded' by Clinton in previous years...lets do our due diligence