Is Bush really the worst President ever - Economically the answer is YES

[gnome]

Quote from jjf:

That is odd gnome, I thought the Iraqi numbers were higher than that.

And shouldnt you be counting the Brit, Aussie, Kiwi, Japan, Pole etc etc figures.

Dead is dead and wounded is wounded.

Oh and dont forget to include the US figures as well.

I was just repeating a recent quote and American casualties... it's even more sad when others are included.

 

[jjf]

Quote from gnome:

I was just repeating a recent quote and American casualties... it's even more sad when others are included.

I agree completely gnome.

 

[gnome]

Do you know any of the history of Andrew Jackson, our 7th President? If not and you're at all curious, just Google.

He had his faults... slave owner (but that was the thing in his time) and treated Indians poorly.. as did nearly everyone. But he was a man who was FOR THE PEOPLE, and FOR THE COUNTRY like few since.

Compared to Andrew Jackson, Bush doesn't deserve for the people to even PISS ON HIS SHOES!

 

[SteveD]

Again, no facts....

You conviently left our the intelligence services of Russia, France, Germany and the UK.....

Facists learned long ago if you yell a lie long enough people will begin to believe you....

The UN???? Don't be silly, son.....Saddam said himself they would start it up as soon as the inspectors left....

If, and that is a big if, a Dem is elected Pres and we have another attack God help him/her....

Gotta go attend to business......good luck in trading...

As the more mature posters have said: You should have seen the 70".....bad bad bad.....this economy is a piece of cake...


SteveD

 

[BSAM]

Quote from SteveD:

.....If, and that is a big if, a Dem is elected Pres and we have another.....

Uhmmm.....Have you not heard who the Rublican nominee is going to be??

 

[gnome]

Quote from BSAM:

Uhmmm.....Have you not heard who the Rublican nominee is going to be??

Looks like it's going to be McCain. I hope so... not because I'm a supporter, but so that if he gets elected and has an active veto pen, he might postpone the morphing of the USA to the USSA (United Socialist States of America).

 

[Landis82]

Quote from SteveD:

As the more mature posters have said: You should have seen the 70".....bad bad bad.....this economy is a piece of cake...


SteveD

You haven't seen nothin' yet.

The jury is still out whether this "train-wreck" has just begun and in its infancy . . . Gotta love the WEAK DOLLAR policy of the last 7 years, eh?

Oh, and if you think that the banking system is in decent shape, take a look at how the "non-borrowed" reserves went negative for the week ending Feb. 13th . . . Ever seen that before?

http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h3/Current/

Not me, and I was born in the 50's.

 

[bat1]

bush sucks bad..my dog could do a better job!

 

[Landis82]

Quote from jjf:

Now there is an excellent thought Humpy.

Declare him a national disaster and put him under the care of HLS and Michael can run the show.

Too bad there wasn't some White House aid that could have given him a "blow-job" like Lewinsky did with Clinton.

Then we would have been rid of the moron.

 

[Landis82]

Quote from optioncoach:

Bush is bad but the hyperbole is kind of funny... Housing bubble was caused by falling interest rates and a lot of things outside of the Executive Branch (private sector lending money to those wo could not afford it etc..). I think people forget that we have had some really bad leaders in this country in the early part of the 1900s and 1800s.

Outside of the Executive Branch?
Are you serious?

And who was responsible for appointing the Treasury Secretary that has been responsible for the "weak" dollar policy?

Who was responsible for reappointing Alan Greenspan . . . a Fed Chairman that was overly supporting of the policies of GW Bsh, as well as the policies that have lead to the housing bubble?

Please.
Stop making excuses for this guy.