IRS Targeted Donors To Tea Party Groups

I mean, we both make 100k, but you give 10k to the TEA party and only have to pay taxes on 90k. I spend all my money on beer and cigarettes and I have to pay taxes on the whole 100k. How is that fair?

(not to mention all the extra alcohol and tobacco taxes I pay to support your corrupt government who you are bitching about because they won't give one party the same breaks they give another party.)
 
Well...he does converse with "himself" quite frequently...Note some of the threads where he might post a dozen times to "himself" with nary a reply...
I've been warned about that and I'm working on it. Sorry, I have a very active mind and sometimes can't wait for an opposing reply because I already realize the fallacy in what I just posted. I'm trying to get it to where I only reply if someone replies to me. I know you didn't reply to me directly, but it was close enough to deserve a reply. Thanks for the conversation.
 
I've been warned about that and I'm working on it. Sorry, I have a very active mind and sometimes can't wait for an opposing reply because I already realize the fallacy in what I just posted. I'm trying to get it to where I only reply if someone replies to me. I know you didn't reply to me directly, but it was close enough to deserve a reply. Thanks for the conversation.
ha...no problem. I understand your dilemma; this site used to be 10x more active.
 
Looking from the outside it seems to me that the fed has been amazingly successful in bringing the economy back from where is was 6 years ago. But it sure is worrying about the almost zero interest rates.. I would like to read a long dissertation by tsing tao on that..
His comments on the thread about the japanese economy were so useful that my son, who is in an honors program, adjusted his thesis after reading it.
 
Last edited:
Looking from the outside it seems to me that the fed has been amazingly successful in bringing the economy back from where is was 6 years ago. But it sure is worrying about the almost zero interest rates.. I would like to read a long dissertation by tsing tao on that..
His comments on the thread about the japanese economy were so useful that my son, who is in an honors program, adjusted his thesis after reading it.

Thank you for the compliments, roberk. I'm humbled, sir.

I would not agree that the Fed has been successful in doing anything but inflating asset prices (which is really all they can do). The stock market at all time highs does not represent the situation on the ground. The unemployment rate is a statistical lie, calculated in a convenient fashion to exclude long term unemployed or discouraged workers. Just about every economical stat you would look at to gauge a country's health is worrying. Not that the Fed can directly affect the unemployment rate in any regards - they have no tools for it.
 
Perhaps you should do some reading. I may be what you think you are.

By the way, while you're reading you might want to look up Bulgarian finance minister Simeon Djankov. You two think alike.

Actually, you should do less reading and actually focus on what's going on in the read world. I had an uncle like you once - book smart and thought he knew everything because of all the reading he always did. No common sense whatsoever, and certainly no idea how to apply his knowledge.

Could tell you all the science behind why it rained - never knew to come in from the rain.
 
Looking from the outside it seems to me that the fed has been amazingly successful in bringing the economy back from where is was 6 years ago. But it sure is worrying about the almost zero interest rates.. I would like to read a long dissertation by tsing tao on that..
His comments on the thread about the japanese economy were so useful that my son, who is in an honors program, adjusted his thesis after reading it.

One thing i learned, only years after i got my degree in economics, is that teachers dont want to hear any opinion that is critical of left wing economics...... Your son sounds like a studious child who is legitimately trying to understand concepts instead of regurgitating them, well done, it must make you proud as a papa!

Against all my inner beliefs, if I had to give him advice on this paper id say your son is probably better off talking about what an unbridled success keynesian economics has been in japan..... if hes looking for a good grade. :D

Reminds me of the scene in "Thank you for smoking" where aron eckhart, the tobacco lobbyist talks to his son about defending tobacco companies, and the kid naievely asks his dad if he has flexible morals. :D

(For anyone who pays attention to politics this movie is a must, they absolutely knocked it out of the park.)

 
Last edited:
Ha. Thanks for the wise advice maxi. I think he will hedge any "conservative" conclusions in ways that don't rock the received wisdom too much.
 
Ha. Thanks for the wise advice maxi. I think he will hedge any "conservative" conclusions in ways that don't rock the received wisdom too much.
Also look into all the success of tax increases and spending cuts during the recession and the "recovery" for the past 5+ years.
 
Also look into all the success of tax increases and spending cuts during the recession and the "recovery" for the past 5+ years.


I don't know about any spending cuts, but we have had tax increases, and you were right and proper to put the 'recovery' in quotation marks.

US gdp grew from $14.4 trillion to $17.6 trillion from 2009 to 2014.

US debt grew from $11.9 trillion to $17.8 trillion from 2009 to 2014.

http://useconomy.about.com/od/usdebtanddeficit/a/National-Debt-by-Year.htm

As you can see, the debt grew by $5.9 trillion dollars, while gdp grew by $3.2 trillion dollars.

For those who don't know, gov't spending is counted as gdp.
All we did was borrow $5.9 trillion dollars of gdp from the future, while actual growth without borrowing from the future was a negative $2.7 trillion dollars.

And the above is the sum total of the bogus, flim flam economics known as keynesian, aggregate demand theory economics.

What you would call organic growth, or 'same store sales' of US gdp has been negative ever since Obama has been in office and the flim flam artists have been in charge.

We have done absolutely nothing except borrow gdp from the future. Going into debt to fund current consumption is the idiots guide to running an economy.

But you want to know the best part? They say we're going to 'grow our way out of it'. Piezoe has said it many times.
Borrow money for consumption, and expect it to result in future growth. Because investing in consumption is what normally promotes growth, right?

Most of us who are out of the beltway loop and not allowed to participate in economic discussion always thought that you invested to promote future growth. That's considered outdated and old fashion now.

We'll see.
 
Back
Top