I told you BS was BS!

I would phrase it a bit differently, but if one truly has built a better model, wouldnt they be obscenely wealthy???
In fairness, there are examples of people using better models and making big bucks. One case study would be the guys at BoA who started using UVM for corporate call spreads. But this usually is in non-listed space and mostly driven by ability to manage these risks better
 
You are missing the point..You claim BS is garbage,and you have seemingly built a better mousetrap.. In extremely liquid markets with tight spreads,it really hard to be off on pricing.
If your model is so much better,you are implying that you are finding pricing discrepencies between your model and BS and delta hedging to capture pricing inefficiencies..

I dont need models for several reasons...

I pick off market makers all day long. I have no idea what Vol is,what the market is doing...
I have traded long enough to know where and when to bid and offer,taking virtually no risk other than execution... No need for any model

More to the point,with penny wide markets,models dont really offer much. How off can one be in pricing??

Last but not least,if I am delta hedging,an approximaton is close enough.I dont need delta perfect,thats not my bet,nor where the money is made.

You claim you built a better model..Lets see it



Wait, so now that you work directly with making a market in options, you don't even use BS because you found another better inefficiency that is based on the data. I mean, dude, that is my very point.

To be fair, I don't have a model. I don't do these things, it's going to take research. My point is simply that because BS violates all the properties of good modeling, I have confidence that given the opportunity I could beat it using sound stat modeling if I could get someone to present me a use case with benchmarks to beat. And if I can't beat it, then well, won't that feel like a small vindication for a few of you.

If I was trading options, which I don't because I haven't finished my analysis yet, I would simply use them as a means to increase leverage and take short short side without having to sell anything. Simple, straight forward, easy to understand. Just the way I like it.
 
In fairness, there are examples of people using better models and making big bucks. One case study would be the guys at BoA who started using UVM for corporate call spreads. But this usually is in non-listed space and mostly driven by ability to manage these risks better


OTC and customer is known.
 
Back
Top