You are missing the point..You claim BS is garbage,and you have seemingly built a better mousetrap.. In extremely liquid markets with tight spreads,it really hard to be off on pricing.
If your model is so much better,you are implying that you are finding pricing discrepencies between your model and BS and delta hedging to capture pricing inefficiencies..
I dont need models for several reasons...
I pick off market makers all day long. I have no idea what Vol is,what the market is doing...
I have traded long enough to know where and when to bid and offer,taking virtually no risk other than execution... No need for any model
More to the point,with penny wide markets,models dont really offer much. How off can one be in pricing??
Last but not least,if I am delta hedging,an approximaton is close enough.I dont need delta perfect,thats not my bet,nor where the money is made.
You claim you built a better model..Lets see it
all interesting points.
except the last one. i did not claim that. i just said if you give me a use case and benchmark, i could probably beat it without BS. i specifically said i would have to do some research to make that happen.
but honestly, this is the most interesting answer from you so far, and makes it more clear what your point is.
