Quote from wrbtrader:
Reality check...there are things that can't be measure (quantified) that has an enormous impact on one's trading results for discretionary retail traders...
Discipline and Trade Experience.
Most traders don't really talk about it but its there every trading day doing good or bad. In contrast, traders tend to talk about things that can easily be visualized and/or explained. That's why its easier for someone to talk about TA, fundamentals, breaking news, global economies but not so easy to talk about discipline or trade experience.
Discipline and Trade Experience are critical elements of someones trading plan. To continue debating someone that say they uses TA because its something they can easily talk about is just odd.
The issue is YOU surf. Why do you not have the ability to see between the lines when someone says "TA works" in comparison to someone that says "TA does not work".![]()
If you're going to discuss quantifiable TA, you best stop arguing with discretionary traders like cornix and NoDoji and instead go find yourself automated traders to continue your debates.
I agree about the intuitive aspect of discretionary trading, but still want to observe it in real life.
Interestingly points, WRB. Now, the professional traders who I know and are anti- TA are mostly wildly succesful with all the trappings of success to go along with it. because they found a real edge to exploit, not playing the penny slots which at best, this PA trading seems to be.
However, the majority of the TA true believers I know are not succesful in the market consistently and live meager existences eeking out a living----- There are exceptions, but the TA exceptions always involve managed money fee success-- so its tough to tell where the capital comes from.
WILL ANYONE ALLOW ME TO OBSERVE PRICE ACTION TRADING FOR 5 DAYS IN A ROW, if you refuse to take the combine??
