You think you can control your hunger while maintaining a 40-50% calorie deficit? Good luck with that. It may work for a very short while and the dieter will lose some weight, but then he will come to a grinding halt as the metabolism goes into survival mode and slows down. And "doing without" that substantially for any length of time causes people to cheat, crash and burn. That's just reality, proven over and over again. Crash diets inevitably crash. The tortoise wins the race.why? if eating such that hunger is managed, there is no reason why such a deficit can't be maintained for a long period. Not talking forever, but a few months at a minimum.
Some years ago, I had volumetric measurements done a few times and compared that to the results from using calipers and from using an impedance scale. By now, having gone through so many diet cycles, I kinda know what I look like at different levels of body fat.Just wondering how you are measuring your body fat %?
You think you can control your hunger while maintaining a 40-50% calorie deficit? Good luck with that. It may work for a very short while and the dieter will lose some weight, but then he will come to a grinding halt as the metabolism goes into survival mode and slows down. And "doing without" that substantially for any length of time causes people to cheat, crash and burn. That's just reality, proven over and over again. Crash diets inevitably crash. The tortoise wins the race.
The slower the metabolism, the more a person has to cut back on calories in order to keep from gaining weight.
(the less you weigh, the less your metabolism rate, basic physics.)
Stated perhaps more accurately, the less lean body mass you have, the lower will be your metabolic rate, all else being equal.(the less you weigh, the less your metabolism rate, basic physics)