Government Report Finds Drastic Impact of Climate Change on U.S.

[exGOPer]

Here you go with the bullshit big oil funding argument. I have shown many times on this site that a multiple of money goes to climate alarmist. Therefore, if money is causing bias in science and a multiple goes to the alarmist side, how can alarmist research and papers not be bias?

If it's bullshit then why was it proven when the Heartland emails were leaked?

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/15/leak-exposes-heartland-institute-climate

And what bias did the Koch funded scientist have who was a skeptic??? Do explain.

 

[exGOPer]

BTW - How in hell did you respond so quickly? Are you paid by anyone to make your post?

I haven't even researched article you posted yet. How did you find it so quickly?

I did google search of scientist name and that article doesn't even come up on front page of Google. Something seems very fishy.

Because I am online? What's with your Cons and your shill and troll accusations, you guys can't fathom that someone disagrees with your idiocy and is quick on the uptake.

And your arguments aren't new, every right wing Con reading these shit blogs peddles the same crap.

And this scientist was discussed here before, ask jem.

 

[WeToddDid2]

If it's bullshit then why was it proven when the Heartland emails were leaked?

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/15/leak-exposes-heartland-institute-climate

And what bias did the Koch funded scientist have who was a skeptic??? Do explain.

It is blatantly clear. If you want to make money as a climate scientist and feed your family, you better be a climate alarmist.

Can you name some other sources of money for scientist that are climate realist?

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/15/leak-exposes-heartland-institute-climate
The documents posted on Desmog's website include confidential memos of Heartland's climate science denial strategy, its 2012 budget and fundraising plan, and minutes from a recent board meeting.

The fundraising plan suggests Heartland is hoping for a banner year, projecting it will raise $7.7m in 2012, up 70% from last year.

https://www.gao.gov/key_issues/climate_change_funding_management/issue_summary
Federal funding for climate change research, technology, international assistance, and adaptation has increased from $2.4 billion in 1993 to $11.6 billion in 2014, with an additional $26.1 billion for climate change programs and activities provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009.

Note: OMB has also reported on federal funding for wildlife and natural resource adaptation since 2010. However, the data the agency reports in the adaptation category does not fully represent adaptation funding as it only includes data from the Department of Interior. OMB reports Department of Interior funding for adaptation (adjusted for inflation) as follows: 2010 $71 million, 2011 $37 million, 2012 $92 million, 2013 $98 million, 2014 $112 million.

 

[WeToddDid2]

Because I am online? What's with your Cons and your shill and troll accusations, you guys can't fathom that someone disagrees with your idiocy and is quick on the uptake.

And your arguments aren't new, every right wing Con reading these shit blogs peddles the same crap.

And this scientist was discussed here before, ask jem.

$100,000!? $7.7m!? Blahahahahaha. That is just peanuts in the climate science game.

 

[exGOPer]

$100,000!? $7.7m!? Blahahahahaha. That is just peanuts in the climate science game.

So he is a shill too even though he was funded by the right wing and a skeptic? So why do you link to pieces researched by those directly funded by the oil lobby? We should dismiss all of the Heartland 'scientists' by your criteria right?

 

[jem]

learn to read asshole...

As I said ... it says he works for NASA on wikipedia and your link.

"Spencer's research work is funded by NASA, NOAA, DOE and the DOT.[4]"


Now... if you are saying his bio and wikipedia are stale... maybe you are correct... but you should prove it before you act like a dick.

by the way... this is what I wrote...
and he does work with NASA keeping track of its Satellites data.

So fuck off.



"he works with NASA keeping track of the Satellite weather data.
is that heartland propaganda... you troll. The Data comes from NASA. you are beyond a troll...

Roy Warren Spencer (born December 20, 1955)[1] is a meteorologist,[2] a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, and the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA's Aqua satellite.[3][4] He has served as senior scientist for climate studies at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.[3][4]

He is known for his satellite-based temperature monitoring work, for which he was awarded the American Meteorological Society's Special Award.[4]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Spencer_(scientist)

You are an idiot.

Wiki page doesn't say he WORKS for Nasa, only that he WORKED for them.

Second, the Heartland bio is old, I linked it to show you that he is a paid shill.

Third, learn to read troll.

"

 

[exGOPer]

It is blatantly clear. If you want to make money as a climate scientist and feed your family, you better be a climate alarmist.

Can you name some other sources of money for scientist that are climate realist?

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/15/leak-exposes-heartland-institute-climate
The documents posted on Desmog's website include confidential memos of Heartland's climate science denial strategy, its 2012 budget and fundraising plan, and minutes from a recent board meeting.

The fundraising plan suggests Heartland is hoping for a banner year, projecting it will raise $7.7m in 2012, up 70% from last year.

https://www.gao.gov/key_issues/climate_change_funding_management/issue_summary
Federal funding for climate change research, technology, international assistance, and adaptation has increased from $2.4 billion in 1993 to $11.6 billion in 2014, with an additional $26.1 billion for climate change programs and activities provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009.

Note: OMB has also reported on federal funding for wildlife and natural resource adaptation since 2010. However, the data the agency reports in the adaptation category does not fully represent adaptation funding as it only includes data from the Department of Interior. OMB reports Department of Interior funding for adaptation (adjusted for inflation) as follows: 2010 $71 million, 2011 $37 million, 2012 $92 million, 2013 $98 million, 2014 $112 million.

Terrific point, using your logic, diseases are a scam because research funding for NIH has been increasing.

 

[exGOPer]

learn to read asshole...

As I said ... it says he works for NASA on wikipedia and your link.

"Spencer's research work is funded by NASA, NOAA, DOE and the DOT.[4]"


Now... if you are saying his bio and wikipedia are stale... maybe you are correct... but you should prove it before you act like a dick.

That citation links to a 2007 Congressional statement when the guy actually worked for NASA. So no, he doesn't work for NASA anymore, he WORKED there and is now a paid shill.

As someone said, learn to read asshole.

 

[jem]

He does exactly what I said he does.
He works with NASA on their Satellite data.

so fuck off troll liar.

 

[exGOPer]

I finished the quote.
He does exactly what I said he does.

so fuck off troll liar.

You said he WORKS for NASA, even granting a stale citation excuse, being funded by an organization doesn't mean they work for the organization either.

Don't be upset because you are wrong because you are wrong so often.