Government Report Finds Drastic Impact of Climate Change on U.S.

this was the post... that prompted your bullshit about him being a heartland propagandist...

I stated he works with NASA keeping track of the data. (read it yourself)

So fuck off you troll. That was a correct statement.

later... I may have used the word works ...
but that is not important. (the citation you used said works)

you are being a troll asshole who acted like all he did was work for heartland.
your own citation... says works.

he works with NASA keeping track of the Satellite weather data.
is that heartland propaganda... you troll. The Data comes from NASA. you are beyond a troll...

Roy Warren Spencer (born December 20, 1955)[1] is a meteorologist,[2] a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, and the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA's Aqua satellite.[3][4] He has served as senior scientist for climate studies at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.[3][4]

He is known for his satellite-based temperature monitoring work, for which he was awarded the American Meteorological Society's Special Award.[4]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Spencer_(scientist)
 
This is from the bio page you cited.

Stop being an asshole... and admit you were wrong. douchebag. exbrainer

"Dr. Spencer’s work with NASA continues as the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite. His diligent work on tracking the planet’s temperature provided a tamper-proof source of data with which to test predictions of man-made global warming. He has provided congressional testimony several times on the subject of global warming. "
 
Terrific point, using your logic, diseases are a scam because research funding for NIH has been increasing.

ucm113296.gif
Do you think that a scientist that wanted to do a research paper that didn't fit the climate warming religion narrative could have gotten money from the gov't while Obama was President?
 
So it's a draft that's not even peer reviewed and that's the evidence? Really?
He also illustrates in video of how graphs have dramatically changed overtime from peer-reviewed and IPCC papers.

Also, some of what he presented in video is basic elementary math. A peer-reviewed paper is not necessary.
 
He also illustrates in video of how graphs have dramatically changed overtime from peer-reviewed and IPCC papers.

Also, some of what he presented in video is basic elementary math. A peer-reviewed paper is not necessary.

I could link you to some nutjobs very convincingly arguing that 9/11 was an inside job.
 
Do you think that a scientist that wanted to do a research paper that didn't fit the climate warming religion narrative could have gotten money from the gov't while Obama was President?

That's not how science works though. You don't bring your bias trying to disprove something. Any scientist wanting to do so would get a grant for climate research and report contrary findings if the science led to that conclusion.
 
That's not how science works though. You don't bring your bias trying to disprove something. Any scientist wanting to do so would get a grant for climate research and report contrary findings if the science led to that conclusion.
That is the way science is suppose to work. That is not how it works now. Any scientist with a dissenting view is shunned, character assassinated and many times fired. That is the opposite of how science is suppose work.
 
That is the way science is suppose to work. That is not how it works now. Any scientist with a dissenting view is shunned, character assassinated and many times fired. That is the opposite of how science is suppose work.

Sort of like working for Google, eh?
 
Back
Top