Government Report Finds Drastic Impact of Climate Change on U.S.

Fake News... confirmed by real data and science.

the first sentence is complete bullshit...
see for yourself...

that centered line is straight across... so how can anyone with a degree and a pulse act like we have been warming since 1980... to claim its rapid is even more disgraceful.

these are facts... this is real data.

even if you took another data set... it would vary only a tiny fraction of a degree. the centered line would barely move... it would easily be well within the margin for error.


Fake News... confirmed.


UAH_LT_1979_thru_June_2017_v6.jpg




exGOPer said:
The average temperature in the United States has risen rapidly and drastically since 1980, and recent decades have been the warmest of the past 1,500 years, according to a sweeping federal climate change report awaiting approval by the Trump administration.

The draft report by scientists from 13 federal agencies, which has not yet been made public, concludes that Americans are feeling the effects of climate change right now. It directly contradicts claims by President Trump and members of his cabinet who say that the human contribution to climate change is uncertain, and that the ability to predict the effects is limited.

“Evidence for a changing climate abounds, from the top of the atmosphere to the depths of the oceans,” a draft of the report states. A copy of it was obtained by The New York Times.

The authors note that thousands of studies, conducted by tens of thousands of scientists, have documented climate changes on land and in the air. “Many lines of evidence demonstrate that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse (heat-trapping) gases, are primarily responsible for recent observed climate change,” they wrote.

The report was completed this year and is a special science section of the National Climate Assessment, which is congressionally mandated every four years. The National Academy of Sciences has signed off on the draft report, and the authors are awaiting permission from the Trump administration to release it.



One government scientist who worked on the report, Katharine Hayhoe, a professor of political science at Texas Tech University, called the conclusions among “the most comprehensive climate science reports” to be published. Another scientist involved in the process, who spoke to The New York Times on the condition of anonymity, said he and others were concerned that it would be suppressed.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...ft-of-the-Climate-Science-Special-Report.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/07/climate/climate-change-drastic-warming-trump.html
More...
 
peilthetraveler said:
The good news is that if man made climate change is real, it will kill all the democrats first because they are the ones that tend to live by the coast in major cities.

Boston, S.F., L.A., NYC...all underwater.
More...

I actually know educated people who believe this. One of them recently bought a mountain property to be able to escape the catastrophic flooding that is inevitable. I asked "could you even notice if sea levels rose a few inches?" Blank stare in response.
 
jem said:
Fake News... confirmed by real data and science.

the first sentence is complete bullshit...
see for yourself...

that centered line is straight across... so how can anyone with a degree and a pulse act like we have been warming since 1980... to claim its rapid is even more disgraceful.

these are facts... this is real data.

even if you took another data set... it would vary only a tiny fraction of a degree. the centered line would barely move... it would easily be well within the margin for error.


Fake News... confirmed.


UAH_LT_1979_thru_June_2017_v6.jpg
More...

Your whole argument is based on flawed RSS data which a denier himself says should not be used.

"But, until the discrepancy is resolved to everyone’s satisfaction, those of you who REALLY REALLY need the global temperature record to show as little warming as possible might want to consider jumping ship, and switch from the UAH to RSS dataset."

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/07...n-the-uah-and-rss-global-temperature-records/
 
gwb-trading said:
You can hire a panel of monkeys to peer review this nonsense.... and they probably did.
More...

You could? Then why couldn't you guys have to spread a fake paper saying it was peer reviewed, could have gotten it peer reviewed by monkeys instead.
 
peilthetraveler said:
Yeah, but it's not 50/50. You'll lose way more democrats than we will republicans.
More...

Republicans are not winning because of numbers but because of geography, so uneven split may not work out for you guys in places like Florida.
 
that article is from 2011.
the data has since been adjusted to account for things like orbit degradation and the data and the pre pause buster data were very similar.

and its not like the hadcrut data is flawless either. it keep getting adjusted up to show warming... As we showed you in other threads recently.

There is no warming outside of statistical norms.

exGOPer said:
Your whole argument is based on flawed RSS data which a denier himself says should not be used.

"But, until the discrepancy is resolved to everyone’s satisfaction, those of you who REALLY REALLY need the global temperature record to show as little warming as possible might want to consider jumping ship, and switch from the UAH to RSS dataset."

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/07...n-the-uah-and-rss-global-temperature-records/
More...
 
jem said:
that article is from 2011.
the data has since been adjusted to account for things like orbit degradation and the data and the pre pause buster data were very similar.

and its not like the hadcrut data is flawless either. it keep getting adjusted up to show warming... As we showed you in other threads recently.

There is no warming outside of statistical norms.
More...

Yes it was adjusted and that's not good news for you

https://www.carbonbrief.org/major-correction-to-satellite-data-shows-140-faster-warming-since-1998

Researchers from Remote Sensing Systems (RSS), based in California, have released a substantially revised version of their lower tropospheric temperature record.

After correcting for problems caused by the decaying orbit of satellites, as well as other factors, they have produced a new record showing 36% faster warming since 1979 and nearly 140% faster (i.e. 2.4 times larger) warming since 1998. This is in comparison to the previous version 3 of the lower tropospheric temperature (TLT) data published in 2009.

Climate sceptics have long claimed that satellite data shows global warming to be less pronounced than observational data collected on the Earth’s surface. This new correction to the RSS data substantially undermines that argument. The new data actually shows more warming than has been observed on the surface, though still slightly less than projected in most climate models.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top