He looks like a simpleton. >
That 21 and me-- whooo. She is very tight I agree but the ethics here...
They basically got all this spit DNA info for free and now want to develop stuff.
I'm cool with that but do you have a ethical problem here? You should tell the poor soul they have a problem even if they don't want to know.. Then anxiety.
and as I read it they fall back on having people self report their health issue which makes their data base not quite as smart.
Wojcicki and her co-founders weren’t the first to think of building a database for this purpose, but using consumer DNA kits as an input soon gave her company a massive scalar advantage over pretty much everyone. (The only bigger known databases belong to Ancestry.com and the Chinese government.) 23andMe started selling its kits in 2007, pitching them mostly as a way to assess a smattering of health traits, such as a customer’s risk of colorectal cancer or likelihood of lactose intolerance, along with a rudimentary version of its ancestry analysis. Criticism soon followed. One article, published in the journal BMJ in 2008, argued that “rather than improving health, widespread genetic testing is likely to result in widespread anxiety.” On these sorts of grounds, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration forced the company to stop selling its tests without approval in 2013. Other critics questioned whether consumers could self-report their own health data accurately. 23andMe relies on customers to help its analysis along by flagging known health issues—