Gallup - Majority Say concealed weapons make US safer

[Frederick Foresight]

...he probably felt unsafe because the guy kept staring at him. I don't expect a sissy like yourself to understand...

He felt unsafe so I'm the sissy? Narrative much?

 

[Frederick Foresight]

...obsessed...

"Obsessed?" I merely have a memory. Evidently, this is unfamiliar territory for you.

 

[jimmiebarton]

Assuming that wasn't exaggeration for the story telling aspect, he probably felt unsafe because the guy kept staring at him. I don't expect a sissy like yourself to understand the possibility that someone else, in a place you know nothing about, could have felt like he was threatened and might have been exposed to violence and didn't wet himself because of it. I've been in uncomfortable situations like the one he described. The hairs on the back of your neck standing up and your 6th sense is telling you something just isn't right. When I've had my firearm in those situations, I felt slightly better. This doesn't mean I was getting ready to waste everyone in the room in a rampage.

I don't expect a cretin like you to understand this concept, so let's just get back on the topic of useless gun control suggestions and let whatever supposedly happened to a member no longer on this forum remain in an obscure story, years ago when it happened.

answer my question or you risk on MY ignore:

I'm curious do you believe fully automatic should be available for public consumption too?

Do you set any limits?

 

[Tsing Tao]

He felt unsafe so I'm the sissy? Narrative much?

No, you're the sissy because you want to disarm the man so he can't defend himself. You and your ilk think these situations can be resolved through peaceful discourse. Everyone dancing through fields of daisies and such. Or perhaps pansies, in your case.

 

[Tsing Tao]

"Obsessed?" I merely have a memory. Evidently, this is unfamiliar territory for you.

I remember Lucrum and Leap just fine. I just don't obsess over their posts that are years old. The fact that you went back just over two years to find a post by a member of this forum who hasn't been here in a while just to bring up a conversation the ex-member had on this forum for...well, who knows what true purpose lies in your twisted 3 cubic inch skull.

 

[Tsing Tao]

answer my question or you risk on MY ignore:

I'm curious do you believe fully automatic should be available for public consumption too?

Do you set any limits?

Oh, God...PLEASE put me on your ignore. This will accomplish two things - first, I'll be able to laugh and insult you with impunity, and second, you'll not see my threads and provide annoying distractions and grammatical nonsense.

But to answer the question, of course there are limits. Limits as they exist right now in law are perfectly fine. Ie, fully automatic weapons are illegal to be owned by the general public.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

No, you're the sissy because you want to disarm the man so he can't defend himself.

Defend himself from what? An unsmiling face? Keep digging, Thing Foul.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

I remember Lucrum and Leap just fine.

And as with most things, rather selectively, as suits your purpose.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Defend himself from what? An unsmiling face? Keep digging, Thing Foul.

Defend himself from a potential threat - which is why most of us carry.

Digging, indeed. Piss off, sissy.

 

[Tsing Tao]

And as with most things, rather selectively, as suits your purpose.

Yes, I don't try to intimately dig up any and all dirt I possibly can with people here and I try to take them at face value. For instance, you're an obvious shit - so I deal with you as such. But others I try to listen to before classifying them.

Lucrum and Leap had said somethings over the years that certainly made me raise an eyebrow. But all in all, they were far more sane than the rabid mentality in which you lurk among these forums as your permanent past time.