Former US State Governor Questions 9/11 Official Story

Quote from ratboy88:

teriaky's boiler room buddy came over and had him post this.

Yet ANOTHER example of the paranoid delusional thinking that represents the vast majority of twoofers.

Dummy thinks that there is a conspriacy to supress him. Textbook delusions of persecution. It never occurs to twoofers that some people are able to critically think for themselves and see the folly of the whole twoofer movement and feel the need to point out the stupendous ridiculousness of the twoof movement.

Poor wittle twoofer, everyone's out to get you.......
 
Quote from Haroki:

Yet ANOTHER example of the paranoid delusional thinking that represents the vast majority of twoofers.

Dummy thinks that there is a conspriacy to supress him. Textbook delusions of persecution. It never occurs to twoofers that some people are able to critically think for themselves and see the folly of the whole twoofer movement and feel the need to point out the stupendous ridiculousness of the twoof movement.

Poor wittle twoofer, everyone's out to get you.......

like i said.. i used to tease you about being in a boiler room... but i do know they hire really stupid people. so sue me... it all fit!!! lmao :D
 
Quote from ratboy88:

like i said.. i used to tease you about being in a boiler room... but i do know they hire really stupid people. so sue me... it all fit!!! lmao :D

Yes it fits perfectly.

You ARE paranoid, with delusions of persecution because you believe your arguments have merit.

They don't.
 
Quote from DrEvil:

PV=nRT is a GAS law: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_laws

please don't try to apply it to steel!

The "metal creep" and melted steel theories don't hold up. The heat (or metal creep) would require to act on every single beam on every single floor of wtc7 instantaneously in order to create a sub 10 second neat vertical fall. In other words, every single support beam on every level of the building would have to be rendered non-existent within a second or less. The odds of fire/creep/fatigue achieving this level of symetry and sychronisiy are astronimically small. A melted/fatigued frame would result in a slow saggin of parts of the structure, perhaps it might eventually fall onto one side over hours/days, but it has never happened before so i doub it.

Yes I know it's a GAS law, but, the point is that Pressure is proportional to Temperature, and Volume is proportional to Temperature.

1. The Volume of metal increases with increasing Temperature, and in a Controlled environment, an increase in temperature causes an increase in pressure, that is why we have expansion of metals with increased temperature, or the bending of beams, because their movement is restricted. That results in an increase in Tension.

2. "Creep of metals" doesn't need every metal beam to fail. The jets hit at a point where the metal framework structure became weakened enough to cause the weight of the floors above to collapse downwards.

3. There was a sufficiently high temperature generated for a significant length of time with the applied stress, enough to be greater than 0.33Tm (i.e. 329 degrees centigrade) required for tertiary phase "Creep" and catastrophic failure.

4. Every material undergoes creep which is change in strain over time

THAT IS A FACT. It is science. You cannot dispute that .

5. What your suggesting is that for the "secondary creep" where

de/dt = K exp (-B/T), i.e. the slope of the stain time graph is too slow for this to happen between the time that the jets hit and the buildings imploded

and de/dt = Cs^n

where B, C, K and ne are particular for a metal


HOWEVER

Temperature in a closed environment can be 1000-2000 degrees centigrade i.e. a lot greater than 0.33Tm, and for an increased de/dt, the stresses would have also increased.

so what

1. The buildings imploded, and it happed because the structure failed.

2. The structure failed becasue the tertiary creep occured and this is associated with final catastrophic failure

3. The weight of the concrete and steel added to the stress that caused the cascading effect thus causing the implosion

this is a scientific explanation judging from what actually happened and the prevailing conditions

it is also natural for the human being to be sceptical and doubt the truth, because otherwise we wouldn't be human

and that explains why we are fallen, because all we want to do is poke holes into each other.
 
Quote from Haroki:

Yes it fits perfectly.

You ARE paranoid, with delusions of persecution because you believe your arguments have merit.

They don't.

i'm sorry, we all know you are a professional iron worker!

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

iron_worker.jpg
 
Quote from Jayford:

Exactly what the guy interviewed by Popular Mechanics said. He was one of the most experienced guys in the biz. He said at best they may be able to do it in ten days or something like that. And he said it would make a hell of a lot of racket. But the main thing is those floors would be completely closed off to the public for at least a week. That did not happen.

Actually, the events at WTC prior to 9/11 point in the opposite direction.

Security company changes, strange long lasting fire drills, elimination of bomb sniffing dogs, etc.

The Popular Mechanics arguments are selective and easily debatable. The editor is related to the Bush family & administration. Also, most of their explanations are very unique & elaborate. Basically, in their eyes, the cards just happened to line up perfectly by coincidence, hence the official story.

Honestly, if you believe their story, go start a new demolition company and just burn building downs for a fraction of the cost. What's the point of a planned demolition when you can just burn the building down and it will fall down in a perfect symmetrical manner.
 
Quote from ratboy88:

turdo,

give it up... it was 100% a controlled demo... the only ones arguing are those that are scared to death where that leads us to.

1. The logistics required for this were not present prior to 9/11. (that has been proven, and you don't need to be a demo contractor to figure that one out).

2. for a demo implosion to be successful, the lower floors have to be rigged, and there was no evidence of this in the basement or the lower floors which remained in tacked after the implosion.

3. for a demo job to be successful the whole structure has to be rigged and blown up in one go.

none of the above happened so it cannot be a demo job
 
Quote from 1000:

1. The logistics required for this were not present prior to 9/11. (that has been proven, and you don't need to be a demo contractor to figure that one out).

Actually, you're wrong. The creators of "Loose Change" argued this with Popular Mechanics and the Popular Mechanics guys would just avoid the issue.
 
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1307467&highlight=iron#post1307467

Quote from Haroki:

Do you know what an oxy-acetylene torch is?

Do you know what those cuts look like?

I work iron, and I do.....

And that's a torch cut...




http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...=82088&perpage=6&highlight=iron&pagenumber=91

Quote from Haroki:

Wrong, I trade for extra money.

I have a real job...

I build choppers as a hobby....

And how much did YOU make trading this year? What did I read in the P/L thread ? $4k..... LMAO....
 
Back
Top