Former US State Governor Questions 9/11 Official Story

Quote from Turok:

Rat:
>look.. you said you worked on a demo project...

Ahhh ... now you finally state the truth.

I DID say I worked on a demo project -- but I didn't say I worked for a demo contractor.

for.. with... big fucking deal... bottom line you have no clue... my statement stands.
 
Quote from ratboy88:

so the jets knocked off the insulation in bldg 7 ???? lmao.. ok. and if you are talking aobut wtc 1 and 2... are you accounting for the center core beams?


gosh.. it looks like i am asking you a question corky. then i qualified it... i know this is advanced for you. as soon as you master the quote function we will take up this next.
 
turdo,

give it up... it was 100% a controlled demo... the only ones arguing are those that are scared to death where that leads us to.
 
Quote from ratboy88:

for.. with... big fucking deal... bottom line you have no clue... my statement stands.


So, moving on to the insulation issue:

Please show me where I EVEN IMPLIED that "jets knocked off the insulation in bldg 7".

Go ahead ... do your best.

JB
 
Rat:
>as soon as you master the quote function we will
>take up this next.

Apparently you haven't seem my response to your "retarded" post. LOL

Go back and you'll see who the retarded one is.

JB
 
Rat:
>it was 100% a controlled demo... the only ones
>arguing are those that are scared to death where
>that leads us to.

And you know this how?

JB
 
Quote from Turok:

So, moving on to the insulation issue:

Please show me where I EVEN IMPLIED that "jets knocked off the insulation in bldg 7".

Go ahead ... do your best.

JB

already answered this... go back and look. i know it is a tough dynamic to master.
 
Quote from Joe:

Yeah, I saw this last night, I think he might have had a point. If what he said was true about burning temp, and the way buildings fall + that 3rd building.

It's the Twoofers extensions that really show how nutty they are. Since the media ignores all their "facts", the media must be part of the conspiracy. Hundreds of people ran miles of wire and placed thousands of pounds of explosives in all these buildings, and the media was notified in advance with carefully prepared scripts. All to support an invasion of Iraq so Bush could steal their oil.

Thousands and thousands of conspirators in a vast secret society bent upon evil. And not just greasy losers that dropped out of junior high to marry their cousin, but highly educated, well paid professionals. The media (who vote overwhelmingly democratic) - every one of them right there helping out. So we can invade Iraq and steal oil. They love Bush that much. The same crew that tried to use forged memos to stop him from getting reelected. Oh, but now they'll sell their souls for the president.

But they couldn't manage to find any WMDs for some reason. Nope, couldn't bring over some busted up nuclear research equipment. That would be too complicated and involve too many people who might talk. Plus many people were OK with the conspiracy including killing three thousand innocent Americans and invading a country to steal their oil, but planting evidence? No, gotta draw that line someplace.

Here's an outstanding article about these sorts of delusions:

http://www.ejectejecteject.com/archives/000051.html

And (Part I)
http://www.ejectejecteject.com/archives/000136.html

And (Part II)
http://www.ejectejecteject.com/archives/000140.html
 
From an earlier 1000 post

1000:
>1. when using explosives for demolision, there is a
>simultaneous setting off of all explosives.

Not even close to being true. This is as bogus as the "water bag" myth.

IN FACT, *controlled* demo *requires a careful timing of the different charges to control the fall of the building. You remove particular braces/beams/columns with the early charges, wait for the building mass to pivot inward (or whatever direction you have designed for) and then set off the other charges (timed as needed) to keep the mass moving in the desired direction.

JB
 
Back
Top