Quote from Joe:
Yeah, I saw this last night, I think he might have had a point. If what he said was true about burning temp, and the way buildings fall + that 3rd building.
He doesn't have ANY valid point, Joe.
He's in full blown twoofer mode here. Notice that his wrestling name was Jesse "The Body" Ventura, and not Jesse "The Brain" Ventura. There's a good reason for that.
"Burning temps" are a crock of shit. Burning releases joules of energy, and that gets transferred into the surrounding area.
let me explain it this way - if you took the joules released in a camp fire, and concentrated that energy onto say the head of a pin, its temp would be like 20,000C. And if you took the joules released in a nuclear explosionand spread it out over the pacific ocean, its temp would increase by 1/1000th of a degree.
Now, of course a camp fire doesn't warm you up much..... Why? Because its heat is lost into the surrounding atmosphere. The same could be said if you were to take office materials and burn them instead of wood in your camp fire. But air temps in office fires can be 1000-1200C EASILY. Why is that? Because the heat is contained.
This is the problem with twoofer logic. They take the very real measurement of an open air fire of... whatever.... and say that the temps in the towers could not have gotten all that hot. But twoofers are too stupid to not realize that their examples don't apply, since to be an accurate argument, they need to use temps that are taken from fires that are contained. They like to argue that they do apply, mainly because they saw it on youtube (so of course that means it's accurate info, right? LMAO), but they are so mentally prepared, due to their paranoid delusions about some NWO, Illuminati, etc, that this sort of bs makes sense to them.
They're nothing but ignorant and mentally damaged dipshits.
Don't fall for it.
