China did strict lock down on the whole country.
but lets take Wuhan the epicenter... 3000 dead on 10m population, so 300 per m, that is inline with italy and spain currently at about 150 per m, and showing signs of peaking, when all is said and done both prolly end up with 500 per m worst case.
so the US has no where near the population density of Italy / Spain... but even if we hit 500/m, that's 200k death tops, in the worst case scenario.... then compare to the 80k death from the 2018 flu.
you see this whole picture... just a flu+, or flu on steroids.
a real nothing burger if you consider the full out panic.
Why do you keep using that same completely wrong logic where you use numbers:
A) from countries/areas that went into a strict lock-down
B) that are still rising everyday
To extrapolate to US as an argument measures are useless and maximum 200k people can die?
Probably your 145 IQ that can't deal with simple things?
To make it clear: if these countries would not have gone into lock-down there would have been:
A) lots more infected
B) lots more that need urgent medical care
C) even a bigger shortage in IC beds
And combining B) with C): a much higher mortality rate. Whatever the exact number is.
Reason the mortality rate is lower in US at the moment probably is twofold: deaths always lag infections and US is still in the early stages, and the fact that there is more testing in US.
Try to focus all of your 145 IQ's on reading and understanding the above simple logic please, thanks