It is a decision based on legal hair splitting. It will probably be reversed.
Unfortunately, you are probably right.
It is a decision based on legal hair splitting. It will probably be reversed.
They aren't seeking to overturn it so much as demand that it be followed. Or "abided by".
Oh, really? Please make the coherent argument that bans all guns from the City of Chicago in a way that is aligned with the 2nd amendment.
Are all those who want guns members of a militia?
man you're a fool. Despite SC rulings, the entire history and tradition of our nation, and the Founders explanations on the issue.. you still think that being a member of a militia is some kind of prereq for owning a gun. Well you are dead fucking wrong and have 0 evidence to back you up.Are all those who want guns members of a militia?
They are in my state, VA.
man you're a fool. Despite SC rulings, the entire history and tradition of our nation, and the Founders explanations on the issue.. you still think that being a member of a militia is some kind of prereq for owning a gun. Well you are dead fucking wrong and have 0 evidence to back you up.
Are all those who want guns members of a militia?
It is a decision based on legal hair splitting. It will probably be reversed.