That's an early warning sign right there.
Fear and loathing in Las Vegas
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
I agree with all of that. It is all pure speculation, based on instinct only.
Nobel Prize winners endorse Clinton for president
12 / 22
The Hill
Jessie Hellmann2 hrs ago
© Provided by The Hill Clinton ups spending in red states as Trump campaign stumbles
In an open letter to the American people, 70 winners of the Nobel Prize endorsed Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton for president Tuesday.
In the letter, the laureates wrote that Clinton will preserve the country's freedoms, safeguard national security and unite the country to work toward a better future.
"It is imperative that Hillary Clinton be elected as the next President of the United States," the laureates wrote.
"Some of the most pressing problems that the new President will face - the devastating effects of debilitating diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and cancer, the need for alternative sources of energy, and climate change and its consequences - require vigorous support for science and technology and the assurance that scientific knowledge will inform public policy."
That support is essential to the U.S's economic future, they wrote.
"Strong advocacy for science agencies, initiatives to promote innovation and sensible immigration and education policies are crucial to the continued preeminence of the U.S. scientific work force. We need a president who will support and advance policies that will enable science and technology to flourish in our country and to provide the basis of important policy decisions."
The letter makes no mention of Clinton's Republican rival, Donald Trump.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...e-clinton-for-president/ar-AAj6YDL?li=BBnb7Kz
12 / 22
The Hill
Jessie Hellmann2 hrs ago
© Provided by The Hill Clinton ups spending in red states as Trump campaign stumbles
In an open letter to the American people, 70 winners of the Nobel Prize endorsed Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton for president Tuesday.
In the letter, the laureates wrote that Clinton will preserve the country's freedoms, safeguard national security and unite the country to work toward a better future.
"It is imperative that Hillary Clinton be elected as the next President of the United States," the laureates wrote.
"Some of the most pressing problems that the new President will face - the devastating effects of debilitating diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and cancer, the need for alternative sources of energy, and climate change and its consequences - require vigorous support for science and technology and the assurance that scientific knowledge will inform public policy."
That support is essential to the U.S's economic future, they wrote.
"Strong advocacy for science agencies, initiatives to promote innovation and sensible immigration and education policies are crucial to the continued preeminence of the U.S. scientific work force. We need a president who will support and advance policies that will enable science and technology to flourish in our country and to provide the basis of important policy decisions."
The letter makes no mention of Clinton's Republican rival, Donald Trump.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...e-clinton-for-president/ar-AAj6YDL?li=BBnb7Kz
Paid leave reality check: What are the chances of a national law?
By Kelly Wallace, CNN
Updated 8:46 AM ET, Tue October 18, 2016
(CNN)For the first time in a presidential campaign, both the Democratic and Republican nominees have put forward plans calling for mandated paid leave.
While Donald Trump's proposal covers only mothers and is not as expansive as Hillary Clinton's plan, it still represents the first time a Republican presidential nominee has spoken out in favor of paid leave, something that only Democratic presidential nominees have done in recent years.
The United States is the only industrialized nation that does not mandate leave for women after they give birth, and it seems the American public has had enough of that designation. One poll this year found that three out of four Americans support a law calling for 12 weeks of paid family and medical leave for workers...
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/18/health/paid-leave-chances-national-law/index.html
By Kelly Wallace, CNN
Updated 8:46 AM ET, Tue October 18, 2016
(CNN)For the first time in a presidential campaign, both the Democratic and Republican nominees have put forward plans calling for mandated paid leave.
While Donald Trump's proposal covers only mothers and is not as expansive as Hillary Clinton's plan, it still represents the first time a Republican presidential nominee has spoken out in favor of paid leave, something that only Democratic presidential nominees have done in recent years.
The United States is the only industrialized nation that does not mandate leave for women after they give birth, and it seems the American public has had enough of that designation. One poll this year found that three out of four Americans support a law calling for 12 weeks of paid family and medical leave for workers...
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/18/health/paid-leave-chances-national-law/index.html
Nobel Idiot Paul Krugman Worries Trump May 'Assault' Hillary During Debate
BY STEPHEN KRUISER OCTOBER 18, 2016
(Photo by Louise Wateridge / Pacific Press)
Despite definitive proof that it is the Democrats who are interested in stirring up violence during this election, the dumbest man ever to win a Nobel Prize (for an academic pursuit) just can't help belching up fear-mongering:
Follow
Paul Krugman
✔@paulkrugman
I can't be alone in wondering semi-seriously if Secret Service will have to protect HRC from assault ... by rival during tomorrow's debate
is is incredibly irresponsible and stupid, especially given that Krugman has such a big platform. Veteran Krugman watchers know that irresponsible and stupid is pretty much his default mode, however, and the Times doesn't seem to be bothered by it.
Krugman may not have gone public with this sentiment had the O'Keefe video received the kind of coverage it should have. Sadly, things that shed negative light on the Democrats are systematically ignored by the coastal media bubble types. There's a very real possibility that Krugman and the majority of his colleagues weren't even aware of the video.
If ignorance is bliss, Paul Krugman may very well be the happiest man on the planet.
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/1...ssault-hillary-during-debate/?singlepage=true
BY STEPHEN KRUISER OCTOBER 18, 2016
(Photo by Louise Wateridge / Pacific Press)
Despite definitive proof that it is the Democrats who are interested in stirring up violence during this election, the dumbest man ever to win a Nobel Prize (for an academic pursuit) just can't help belching up fear-mongering:
Follow
Paul Krugman ✔@paulkrugman
I can't be alone in wondering semi-seriously if Secret Service will have to protect HRC from assault ... by rival during tomorrow's debate
is is incredibly irresponsible and stupid, especially given that Krugman has such a big platform. Veteran Krugman watchers know that irresponsible and stupid is pretty much his default mode, however, and the Times doesn't seem to be bothered by it.
Krugman may not have gone public with this sentiment had the O'Keefe video received the kind of coverage it should have. Sadly, things that shed negative light on the Democrats are systematically ignored by the coastal media bubble types. There's a very real possibility that Krugman and the majority of his colleagues weren't even aware of the video.
If ignorance is bliss, Paul Krugman may very well be the happiest man on the planet.
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/1...ssault-hillary-during-debate/?singlepage=true
