FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe 'removed' from the bureau

[UsualName]

your logic is so compelling it shows anyone arguing to the contrary to bea partisan clown or deficient in thinking skills.

No it’s not. You have to go deep down a rabbit hole to get where our froggy friend is. He assumes things not proven to be true and has a weak understanding of the application of law.

I will say this, McCabe does have some legitimate ethics exposure. But, we have not seen any evidence of unfaithful administration of justice to date, and this is the entire basis for theory of Clinton not being charged on a trumped up espionage charge.

 

[jem]

He seems to have a lot of inside the Capitol info. Does that make him a paid poster or an insider?

Want to bet he's a paid bot?

 

[jem]

I thought in this exchange we were addressing McCabe's and his bosses ethics issues. I thought this was a pretty good run down of those issues.

If you wish to change the subject a bit that is fine.
Explain this.

The FBI knew that the Clintons and the DNC were paying for dirt on Trump from Russians. The FBI was in on it.

That is Russian collusion to investigate Russian collusion.

So while it is Possible trump and his team broke the law with some sort of Russian Collusion.
.
The FBI would have been already aware that Hillary's team was paying for Russian collusion and the FBI joined in.

Seriously, could you explain to me how you can use oppo research created by Russian collusion to investigate Russian collusion.

No it’s not. You have to go deep down a rabbit hole to get where our froggy friend is. He assumes things not proven to be true and has a weak understanding of the application of law.

I will say this, McCabe does have some legitimate ethics exposure. But, we have not seen any evidence of unfaithful administration of justice to date, and this is the entire basis for theory of Clinton not being charged on a trumped up espionage charge.

 

[RRY16]

He seems to have a lot of inside the Capitol info. Does that make him a paid poster or an insider?

Bot

 

[UsualName]

I thought in this exchange we were addressing McCabe's and his bosses ethics issues.

I already know for a fact there was a clown investigation.

The FBI knew that the Clintons and the DNC were paying for dirt on Trump from Russians. The FBI was in on it.

That is Russian collusion to investigate Russian collusion.

Uh, what?

McCabe has issues with recusal from high level political cases because of his wife and the significant donations she received from democratic politician, namely Terry McCauliffe. Where this is going to end out, I truly don’t know because it is subject to an internal ethics review. It’s not exactly clear what he should have done, no matter what anyone on this board says.

Now as far as McCabe and the Clinton investigation there is zero evidence of any sort of unfaithful administration.

There is a better and stronger case the way Comey handles the Clinton case is unfaithful administration, and that was detrimental to her and benefited Trump.

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

Now as far as McCabe and the Clinton investigation there is zero evidence of any sort of unfaithful administration.

Sorry but this is not true. The FBI's investigation of the Clinton scandal has been repeatedly and pointedly criticized. They gave out immunity promiscuously and without getting anything in return. They could have inducted several of her staffers and tried to turn them, you know, like Mueller is doing to Trump. They didn't even interview her under oath apparently. Clearly they knew where they were supposed to come out, provided they wanted to continue their careers in government.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Sorry but this is not true. The FBI's investigation of the Clinton scandal has been repeatedly and pointedly criticized. They gave out immunity promiscuously and without getting anything in return. They could have inducted several of her staffers and tried to turn them, you know, like Mueller is doing to Trump. They didn't even interview her under oath apparently. Clearly they knew where they were supposed to come out, provided they wanted to continue their careers in government.

Too many problems with McCabe to even list again, and again.

McCabe is involved with the dossier too. People should wait until the end of the week to be so sure that everything he did was unbiased.

And as I said earlier, the IG has interviewed FBI agents as part of his investigation into why McCabe sat on the emails/texts related to huma/weiner for so long with an apparent attempt to keep the under cover until the election was over, until they were outed at the last minute.

The IG is also on McCabe's arse for tamping down the Tarmac investigation and not launching an investigation into that by trying to get the communications records between the Loretta's security detail and Bubba's security detail to determine if they had coordinated before the meeting- which would prove that it was not unplanned. The IG especially wants to know why, rather than investigating it, it sent agents out to threaten the person/reporter who reported the meeting. The issue being that the FBI had no concern about the meeting, but immediately took action to identify and meet with the person who reported it and the existence of pictures.

 

[UsualName]

Sorry but this is not true. The FBI's investigation of the Clinton scandal has been repeatedly and pointedly criticized. They gave out immunity promiscuously and without getting anything in return. They could have inducted several of her staffers and tried to turn them, you know, like Mueller is doing to Trump. They didn't even interview her under oath apparently. Clearly they knew where they were supposed to come out, provided they wanted to continue their careers in government.

With the Clinton, what she did was wrong not illegal. It doesn’t take a genius to understand she wasn’t guilty of committing espionage. And that was the basis of the investigation. It was always flimsy.

 

[jem]

another reframe by lefties. its almost like you are trained to reframe.
Piezoe tried to act like the issue is whether the funding of the campaign was legal.
you are trying to act like the Hillary did not break the law because she had no intent to spy.

Our govt drafted laws which did not require intent.

reckless handling of classified documents does not require an element of intent to commit espionage.

Reckless handling of docs makes espionage by others easier. It does not mean we have to show hillary was a spy. It means she made it easier for others to pick off classified docs because she did not handle them with the requisite care.

With the Clinton, what she did was wrong not illegal. It doesn’t take a genius to understand she wasn’t guilty of committing espionage. And that was the basis of the investigation. It was always flimsy.

 

[UsualName]

another reframe by lefties. its almost like you are trained to reframe.
Piezoe tried to act like the issue is whether the funding of the campaign was legal.
you are trying to act like the Hillary did not break the law because she had not intent to spy.

Our govt drafted make laws which did not require intent.

reckless handling of classified documents does not require and element of intent to commit espionage. Reckless handling of docs makes espionage by others easier. It does not mean we have to show hillary was a spy. It means she made it easier for others to pick off classified docs because she did not handle them with the requisite care.

There were I think 7 classified level emails out of thousands. Classified is the lowest level of secret, this included newspaper articles. That’s not reckless. There was no jeopardy from her behavior to national security.

The Clinton case often gets compared to the sailor that took detailed, specific pictures of a top secret nuclear sub engine. Now consider the difference in material and potential impact on security.