Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

[futurecurrents]

FALSE

And absolutely no science to back up your ignorant opinion.

 

[futurecurrents]

The "Hockey Stick" -- what a joke!!!

The scientists don't think so. Gee, who should we believe, you, or the experts? Hmmm.

 

[jem]

you tell us how the hockey stick could be legit.

Its grafts instrument data onto proxy data.
When the proxy data is carried forward it contradicts the hockey stick.

 

[jem]

 

[Buy1Sell2]

This chart is closer to the actual shape of the temps over this period. The deviation in avg temp is much greater though than "point something"

 

[futurecurrents]

Yeah, science charts always have stuff drawn on them to tell you what to think. Are you idiots serious?

Sorry, but I'll stay with what the scientists think and they think the hockey stick is correct.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

The other individual's chart was prepared with a predetermined result in mind. Very insincere and sinister

 

[Buy1Sell2]

The right has a few fallback positions left.

Man is contributing, but not in the main.
Man is the main contributor, but nothing can be done.
Something could be done, but it's too costly.
It's less costly today then it will be tomorrow, but we need more study.

---and man is not contributing (which is correct)

 

[Ricter]

---and man is not contributing (which is correct)

No one of any repute believes that anymore. The argument has moved on without you. That AGW will not a catastrophe is the current position held by holdouts in science, government, and business.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

No one of any repute believes that anymore. The argument has moved on without you. That AGW will not a catastrophe is the current position held by holdouts in science, government, and business.

You do understand that both polar ice caps are increasing in size, and that the slight warming trend ended 20 yrs ago correct?