Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

[jem]

actually I found one of your recent proofs. you told me to look at the IPCC report.
And I told you I had. If you look at the footnotes you will see their predictions are made on modeling scenarios... not science.

you are such a troll on this ricter. so here it is back at you... How much co2 did your carbon producing company produce today?

 

[WeToddDid2]

No the chart is not false. It is the current best science. Where do you get the idea that it is false?

There is really no point in arguing with someone that denies the facts and science and that does not know what a greenhouse gas is.

Are you related to jem? You sound just as confused.

You are the one that denies science. As you can see below, temps are within natural variability.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v538/n7624/full/nature19798.html

 

[Ricter]

So far every time you have made that claim you have failed to produce peer reviewed science showing man made co2 is causing warming.

Again, IPCC website. Drill down.

You're lazy.

 

[futurecurrents]

You do understand that both polar ice caps are increasing in size, and that the slight warming trend ended 20 yrs ago correct?

No he does not. Ricter is a smart man. I don't know if you trolling or just incredibly misinformed, or just plain stupid. Seeing as how you are a Trumper, I'm going with all three.

 

[futurecurrents]

You are the one that denies science. As you can see below, temps are within natural variability.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v538/n7624/full/nature19798.html

Lying again. That is a chart of your IQ. Note how it started at 72 and has been going down.

 

[Ricter]

Lying again. That is a chart of your IQ. Note how it started at 72 and has been going down.

LOL

 

[futurecurrents]

Again, IPCC website. Drill down.

You're lazy.

I don't think lazy quite explains jerm. It's an ideologically deranged lawyerly lying stance. He doesn't really believe anything he says. Lying through his teeth. He's just like the lawyers that get murderers off. He's like a Jonny Cochran or that Shapiro guy. Lawyers are very well practiced and in fact do best when being intellectually dishonest.

 

[Ricter]

I don't think lazy quite explains jerm. It's an ideologically deranged lawyerly lying stance. He doesn't really believe anything he says. Lying through his teeth. He's just like the lawyers that get murderers off. He's like a Jonny Cochran or that Shapiro guy. Lawyers are very well practiced and in fact do best when being intellectually dishonest.

Jem has expressed more than once a belief that others may be lurking and it their opinions he hopes to corrupt.

 

[futurecurrents]

Jem has expressed more than once a belief that others may be lurking and it their opinions he hopes to corrupt.

Oh yeah, it's obvious that he is on some insane mission to sell a lie. It's amazing how effort he puts into lying.

And I love his mock outrage....calling us trolls and liars and just about having a heart attack while pretending to be outraged at the facts presented. Great acting.

 

[Ricter]

might that be because we have peer reviewed science showing atmsopheric levels of CO2 have been shown to follow the change in ocean temps and we know that ocean temps have been rising?

Your argument:

If A then B.
B.
Therefore not C.